J. C. Holt
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John Hudson (1 shared paper)John Beeler (1 shared paper)George Garnett (1 shared paper)John Gillingham (1 shared paper)R. C. van Caenegem (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (5 papers)Past & Present (3 papers)The English Historical Review (1 paper)American Journal of Legal History (1 paper)The Economic History Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. C. Holt
22 papers receiving 114 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Classics 94
- History 62
- Political Science and International Relations 67
- Law 21
- Economics and Econometrics 36
Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Holt
This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Holt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Holt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Holt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Holt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Holt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Holt. The network helps show where J. C. Holt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside J. C. Holt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 45 | |
| 2 | 1972 | 30 | |
| 3 | 1961 | 12 | |
| 4 | Magna Carta and medieval government | 1985 | 11 |
| 5 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 7 | |
| 10 | Magna Carta and the idea of liberty | 1972 | 6 |
| 11 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 12 | Colonial England, 1066-1215 | 2003 | 5 |
| 13 | 1982 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 15 | Domesday studies : papers read at the Novocentenary Conference of the Royal Historical Society and the Institute of British Geographers, Winchester, 1986 | 1987 | 3 |
| 16 | Jersey 1204: The Forging of an Island Community | 2004 | 3 |
| 17 | The University of Reading: the first fifty years | 1977 | 3 |
| 18 | 1961 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 2 |
About J. C. Holt
J. C. Holt is a scholar working on Classics, History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Law, having authored 25 papers that have together received 188 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (12 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (1 paper), European Law and Migration (1 paper), Theology and Canon Law Studies (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (94 citations), History (62 citations), Political Science and International Relations (67 citations), Law (21 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (36 citations). J. C. Holt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Hudson, John Beeler, George Garnett, John Gillingham and R. C. van Caenegem. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Past & Present, The English Historical Review, American Journal of Legal History and The Economic History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.