H. G. Richardson
- History top 2%
- Classics top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- G. O. SaylesEdward MillerRobert S. HoytRobert C. PalmerRichard T. VannDoris Mary StentonJames A. BrundageB. Wilkinson
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (8 papers)Historical Legal Studies and Society (4 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
H. G. Richardson
20 papers receiving 101 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- History 90
- Classics 81
- Political Science and International Relations 56
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Economics and Econometrics 30
Countries citing papers authored by H. G. Richardson
This map shows the geographic impact of H. G. Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. G. Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. G. Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. G. Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. G. Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. G. Richardson. The network helps show where H. G. Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. G. Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. G. Richardson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. G. Richardson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. G. Richardson. H. G. Richardson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | Bracton : the problem of his text ; being an expansion of a lecture delivered before the Selden Society in the Hall of Gray's Inn on March 28, 1961 | 2 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Parliaments and Great Councils in medieval England | 5 |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About H. G. Richardson
H. G. Richardson is a scholar working on Classics, History and Law, having authored 23 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (4 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (81 citations), History (90 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (56 citations). H. G. Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include G. O. Sayles, Edward Miller, Robert S. Hoyt, Robert C. Palmer, Richard T. Vann, Doris Mary Stenton, James A. Brundage, B. Wilkinson, Joseph Shatzmïller and Bob S. Carter. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, The American Historical Review and The Economic History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.