J. A. Fodor

5.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

J. A. Fodor is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, J. A. Fodor has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9 papers in Language and Linguistics and 6 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in J. A. Fodor's work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). J. A. Fodor is often cited by papers focused on Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). J. A. Fodor collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. J. A. Fodor's co-authors include Thomas G. Bever, Zenon W. Pylyshyn, Merrill F. Garrett, Robert St. Clair, Edward Walker, Charles S. Chihara, Ernie Lepore, Georges Rey, Roberto G. de Almeida and Jay L. Garfield and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Cognition and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In The Last Decade

J. A. Fodor

32 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

The Psychology of Language 1974 2026 1991 2008 1974 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

J. A. Fodor
Edward H. Matthei United States
Henry Gleitman United States
Martin D. S. Braine United States
Terry L. Smith United States
Kenneth Mark Colby United States
Mark H. Bickhard United States
Alan Garnham United Kingdom
Rafael Núñez United States
Ira Noveck France
Barbara C. Malt United States
Edward H. Matthei United States
J. A. Fodor
Citations per year, relative to J. A. Fodor J. A. Fodor (= 1×) peers Edward H. Matthei

Countries citing papers authored by J. A. Fodor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. A. Fodor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. A. Fodor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. A. Fodor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. A. Fodor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. A. Fodor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. A. Fodor. The network helps show where J. A. Fodor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. A. Fodor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. A. Fodor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. A. Fodor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. A. Fodor. J. A. Fodor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fodor, J. A.. (1997). Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work. Cognition. 62(1). 109–119. 20 indexed citations
2.
Almeida, Roberto G. de & J. A. Fodor. (1996). Still looking for structural complexity effects in the representation of lexical concepts. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fodor, J. A. & Ernie Lepore. (1996). Churchland on state space semantics. 1 indexed citations
4.
Fodor, J. A., et al.. (1996). Folk Psychology from the Standpoint of Conceptual Analysis. 4 indexed citations
5.
Fodor, J. A.. (1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition. 44(3). 283–296. 330 indexed citations
6.
Garfield, Jay L. & J. A. Fodor. (1991). Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning In the Philosophy of Mind.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 51(1). 235–235. 2 indexed citations
7.
Fodor, J. A., et al.. (1991). What is wrong with tensor product connectionism. 1 indexed citations
8.
Fodor, J. A.. (1987). 1 A Situated Grandmother? Some Remarks on Proposals by Barwise and Perry. Mind & Language. 2(1). 64–81. 15 indexed citations
9.
Fodor, J. A.. (1986). Information and association.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 27(3). 45 indexed citations
10.
Fodor, J. A.. (1982). Cognitive science and the twin-Earth problem.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 23(2). 36 indexed citations
11.
Fodor, J. A. & Zenon W. Pylyshyn. (1981). How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson's “ecological approach”. Cognition. 9(2). 139–196. 427 indexed citations
12.
Fodor, J. A., et al.. (1980). Against definitions. Cognition. 8(3). 263–367. 126 indexed citations
13.
Fodor, J. A.. (1980). Searle on what only brains can do. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 3(3). 431–432. 14 indexed citations
14.
Fodor, J. A.. (1978). Tom Swift and his procedural grandmother. Cognition. 6(3). 229–247. 79 indexed citations
15.
Fodor, J. A.. (1978). Computation and Reduction. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 9 indexed citations
16.
Fodor, J. A.. (1966). Could There Be a Theory of Perception?. The Journal of Philosophy. 63(13). 369–380. 3 indexed citations
17.
Bever, Thomas G., et al.. (1965). On the acquisition of syntax: A critique of "contextual generalization.". Psychological Review. 72(6). 467–482. 52 indexed citations
18.
Fodor, J. A., et al.. (1963). Some Types of Ambiguous Tokens. Analysis. 24(1). 19–23. 8 indexed citations
19.
Fodor, J. A.. (1961). Of words and uses1. Inquiry. 4(1-4). 190–208.
20.
Fodor, J. A.. (1961). Projection and Paraphrase in Semantics. Analysis. 21(4). 73–77. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026