Iona Naismith

23 total papers · 450 total citations
18 papers, 298 citations indexed

About

Iona Naismith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Iona Naismith has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 298 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Clinical Psychology, 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Iona Naismith's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Iona Naismith is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Iona Naismith collaborates with scholars based in Colombia, United Kingdom and Bolivia. Iona Naismith's co-authors include Janet Feigenbaum, David Veale, Sarah Miles, Nell Ellison, Angelica Kavouni, Dudley Robinson, Gregory D. Stewart, Ertimiss Eshkevari, Lucinda J. Gledhill and Linda Cardozo and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Violence Against Women and Journal of Family Violence.

In The Last Decade

Iona Naismith

17 papers receiving 287 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Iona Naismith 228 85 71 59 54 18 298
John L. Delk 114 0.5× 49 0.6× 138 1.9× 31 0.5× 65 1.2× 25 336
Curren Katz 137 0.6× 56 0.7× 55 0.8× 27 0.5× 65 1.2× 10 299
Carol O’Brien 202 0.9× 55 0.6× 72 1.0× 15 0.3× 31 0.6× 12 337
Ruth Newton 125 0.5× 23 0.3× 33 0.5× 24 0.4× 58 1.1× 13 274
Kate Williams 212 0.9× 69 0.8× 23 0.3× 16 0.3× 61 1.1× 15 284
Laura Celebre 263 1.2× 85 1.0× 38 0.5× 65 1.1× 52 1.0× 20 340
Debora Phillips 227 1.0× 44 0.5× 174 2.5× 19 0.3× 70 1.3× 16 354
Meghan L. McPhie 161 0.7× 36 0.4× 25 0.4× 46 0.8× 48 0.9× 18 320
Karen M. Finello 149 0.7× 30 0.4× 30 0.4× 53 0.9× 33 0.6× 18 352
Aylin Uluşahin 150 0.7× 35 0.4× 126 1.8× 26 0.4× 65 1.2× 18 350

Countries citing papers authored by Iona Naismith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iona Naismith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iona Naismith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iona Naismith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iona Naismith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iona Naismith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iona Naismith. The network helps show where Iona Naismith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iona Naismith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iona Naismith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iona Naismith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Iona Naismith. Iona Naismith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026