Roberta Croce Nanni
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Alberto SiracusanoAlfonso TroisiI. Alex RubinoGiorgio Di LorenzoValeria CarolaDavid Di CaveDaniela PozziTeresa Lanza di Scalea
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyMexicoUnited States
In The Last Decade
Roberta Croce Nanni
13 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Clinical Psychology 184
- Psychiatry and Mental health 78
- Social Psychology 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
- Cognitive Neuroscience 32
Countries citing papers authored by Roberta Croce Nanni
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberta Croce Nanni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberta Croce Nanni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberta Croce Nanni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roberta Croce Nanni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberta Croce Nanni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberta Croce Nanni. The network helps show where Roberta Croce Nanni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberta Croce Nanni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberta Croce Nanni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberta Croce Nanni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roberta Croce Nanni. Roberta Croce Nanni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 81 |
About Roberta Croce Nanni
Roberta Croce Nanni is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (184 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations) and Social Psychology (63 citations). Roberta Croce Nanni has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alberto Siracusano, Alfonso Troisi, I. Alex Rubino, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Valeria Carola, David Di Cave, Daniela Pozzi, Teresa Lanza di Scalea, Ellen Frank and Luca Bianchi. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Affective Disorders and Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.