This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Stephan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Stephan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Stephan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Stephan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Stephan. The network helps show where Inge Stephan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge Stephan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge Stephan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge Stephan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Inge Stephan. Inge Stephan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Benthien, Claudia & Inge Stephan. (2003). Männlichkeit als Maskerade : Kulturelle Inszenierungen vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Böhlau Verlag eBooks.4 indexed citations
10.
Stephan, Inge, et al.. (2003). "Die Wunde Lenz" : J.M.R. Lenz : Leben, Werk und Rezeption. P. Lang eBooks.1 indexed citations
11.
Stephan, Inge. (2002). Undine an der Newa und am Suzhou-River. Wasserfrauen-Phantasien im inter-ulturellen und intermedialen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Germanistik. 12(3). 547–563.2 indexed citations
12.
Stephan, Inge. (1997). Musen & Medusen : Mythos und Geschlecht in der Literatur des 20. Jahrhunderts. Böhlau eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.