Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stein more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stein. The network helps show where Peter Stein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Stein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Stein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Stein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Stein. Peter Stein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stein, Peter, et al.. (2009). The first incantation from Ancient South Arabia.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Stein, Peter, et al.. (2003). Le droit romain et l'Europe : essai d'interprétation historique. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).1 indexed citations
5.
Stein, Peter, et al.. (2003). Romantik und Vormärz : zur Archäologie literalischer Kommunikation in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts.1 indexed citations
6.
Taplin, Oliver, et al.. (2003). Ancient Greek Tragedy on the Stage. 11(1). 125–175.1 indexed citations
7.
Stein, Peter. (2000). Die mittel- und neubabylonischen Königsinschriften bis zum Ende der Assyrerherrschaft : grammatische Untersuchungen. Harrassowitz eBooks.2 indexed citations
8.
Stein, Peter. (1996). Darum mag falsch gewesen sein, nach Auschwitz lieá kein gedicht mehr sich schreiben. (Adorno). Widerruf eines verdikts? Din zitat und seine verkürzung. 42(4). 485–508.2 indexed citations
9.
Stein, Peter. (1995). Interpretation and Legal Reasoning in Roman Law. Chicago-Kent law review. 70(4). 1539.4 indexed citations
Stein, Peter. (1994). The influence of Roman Law on the common law. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 165–169.1 indexed citations
12.
Stein, Peter, et al.. (1992). Ausgestaltung einer Organisationsreform in der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung. Wirtschaftsdienst. 72(3). 159–168.
13.
Helmholz, Richard H., et al.. (1991). Notai in Inghilterra Prima e Dopo la Riforma. Books.1 indexed citations
14.
Stein, Peter, et al.. (1983). Studies in Justinian's Institutes in memory of J.A.C. Thomas. Sweet & Maxwell eBooks.5 indexed citations
15.
Stein, Peter. (1982). Nineteenth Century English Company Law and Theories of Legal Personality. Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno. 11(1). 503–519.3 indexed citations
16.
Stein, Peter. (1979). Adam Smith’s Jurisprudence-Between Morality and Economics. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 64(4). 621–638.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.