Clinical Therapeutics

5.8k papers and 160.8k indexed citations

About

The 5.8k papers published in Clinical Therapeutics in the last decades have received a total of 160.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Therapeutics usually cover Surgery (890 papers), Pharmacology (802 papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (786 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (421 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (414 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (285 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Therapeutics are Marvin M. Goldenberg, Kevin C. Farmer, Joyce A. Cramer, Ami Claxton, Celeste Lindley, Horatio B. Fung, Elizabeth R. Pulgarón, Thomas N. Kakuda, Rajesh Balkrishnan and Huub Schellekens.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Therapeutics

5.5k papers receiving 152.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Therapeutics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Therapeutics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Therapeutics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Therapeutics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026