Imogene Rothnie

414 total citations
10 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Imogene Rothnie is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Imogene Rothnie has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Imogene Rothnie's work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers). Imogene Rothnie is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers). Imogene Rothnie collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Imogene Rothnie's co-authors include Chris Roberts, Merrilyn Walton, Koshila Kumar, Jim Crossley, David J. Tiller, Stewart M. Dunn, Lily Lee, Linda Klein, Ian Wilson and Michael Edwards and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Education, The Medical Journal of Australia and Human Resources for Health.

In The Last Decade

Imogene Rothnie

10 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Imogene Rothnie Australia 7 267 170 41 30 25 10 296
Ellen R. Julian United States 5 289 1.1× 161 0.9× 45 1.1× 18 0.6× 11 0.4× 12 326
Ben Kumwenda United Kingdom 12 284 1.1× 180 1.1× 128 3.1× 43 1.4× 4 0.2× 15 326
Ashley Hawarden United Kingdom 7 153 0.6× 65 0.4× 11 0.3× 43 1.4× 7 0.3× 19 212
Tristan Price United Kingdom 10 129 0.5× 24 0.1× 37 0.9× 75 2.5× 8 0.3× 23 224
Ricky Ellis United Kingdom 9 115 0.4× 85 0.5× 24 0.6× 46 1.5× 2 0.1× 41 216
Wendy Yen Canada 6 232 0.9× 27 0.2× 19 0.5× 102 3.4× 9 0.4× 8 300
Tania K. Arora United States 7 129 0.5× 131 0.8× 49 1.2× 64 2.1× 2 0.1× 17 224
David Garne Australia 10 151 0.6× 65 0.4× 165 4.0× 143 4.8× 3 0.1× 16 267
Alison Whelan United States 8 149 0.6× 139 0.8× 60 1.5× 95 3.2× 10 309
Malika Fair United States 6 117 0.4× 85 0.5× 32 0.8× 57 1.9× 14 196

Countries citing papers authored by Imogene Rothnie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Imogene Rothnie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imogene Rothnie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imogene Rothnie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Imogene Rothnie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imogene Rothnie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imogene Rothnie. The network helps show where Imogene Rothnie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Imogene Rothnie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Imogene Rothnie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Imogene Rothnie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Imogene Rothnie. Imogene Rothnie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Martiniuk, Alexandra, Robyn Ramsden, Elizabeth Barrett, et al.. (2020). Capability ... what's in a word? Rural Doctors Network of New South Wales Australia is shifting to focus on the capability of rural health professionals. Rural and Remote Health. 20(3). 5633–5633. 7 indexed citations
2.
Martiniuk, Alexandra, et al.. (2019). Hypothesis: improving literacy about health workforce will improve rural health workforce recruitment, retention and capability. Human Resources for Health. 17(1). 105–105. 10 indexed citations
3.
Canny, Ben, et al.. (2015). The Australian Medical Schools Assessment Collaboration: benchmarking the preclinical performance of medical students. The Medical Journal of Australia. 202(2). 95–98. 6 indexed citations
4.
Quinnell, Rosanne, et al.. (2014). ExamBank: a Pedagogic and Administrative System to Provide Effective Student Feedback and Stable Assessment Across Disciplines. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 22(3). 1 indexed citations
5.
Walton, Merrilyn, et al.. (2013). When should students learn about ethics, professionalism and patient safety?. The Clinical Teacher. 10(4). 224–229. 6 indexed citations
6.
Tiller, David J., et al.. (2013). Internet‐based multiple mini‐interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes. Medical Education. 47(8). 801–810. 46 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, Chris, et al.. (2010). Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini‐interview?. Medical Education. 44(7). 690–698. 42 indexed citations
9.
Kumar, Koshila, et al.. (2009). Experiences of the multiple mini‐interview: a qualitative analysis. Medical Education. 43(4). 360–367. 50 indexed citations
10.
Roberts, Chris, Merrilyn Walton, Imogene Rothnie, et al.. (2008). Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini‐interview in selecting candidates for graduate‐entry medical school. Medical Education. 42(4). 396–404. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026