Linguistics in the Netherlands

410 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 410 papers published in Linguistics in the Netherlands in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Linguistics in the Netherlands usually cover Language and Linguistics (245 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (106 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (151 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (85 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Linguistics in the Netherlands are Vincent J. van Heuven, Mark de Vries, Charlotte Gooskens, Enoch O. Aboh, Paula Fikkert, Leonie Cornips, Johanneke Caspers, Hans Broekhuis, Jan‐Wouter Zwart and Petra Hendriks.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Linguistics in the Netherlands

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Linguistics in the Netherlands. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Linguistics in the Netherlands.

Countries where authors publish in Linguistics in the Netherlands

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Linguistics in the Netherlands. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Linguistics in the Netherlands with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistics in the Netherlands more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025