Ilmo van der Löwe
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dacher KeltnerChristopher OveisGerben A. van KleefJennifer L. GoetzMichael W. KrausStéphane CôtéBonnie Hayden ChengWarren Mansell
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological SciencePersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Ilmo van der Löwe
8 papers receiving 695 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Social Psychology 394
- Sociology and Political Science 344
- Clinical Psychology 163
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
Countries citing papers authored by Ilmo van der Löwe
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilmo van der Löwe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilmo van der Löwe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilmo van der Löwe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilmo van der Löwe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilmo van der Löwe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilmo van der Löwe. The network helps show where Ilmo van der Löwe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ilmo van der Löwe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ilmo van der Löwe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ilmo van der Löwe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ilmo van der Löwe. Ilmo van der Löwe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 103 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 175 | |
| 8 | 339 |
About Ilmo van der Löwe
Ilmo van der Löwe is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (394 citations), Applied Psychology (71 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 citations). Ilmo van der Löwe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dacher Keltner, Christopher Oveis, Gerben A. van Kleef, Jennifer L. Goetz, Michael W. Kraus, Stéphane Côté, Bonnie Hayden Cheng, Warren Mansell, June Gruber and Bryant P. H. Hui. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.