Erik G. Helzer

1.2k total citations
26 papers, 725 citations indexed

About

Erik G. Helzer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Erik G. Helzer has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 725 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Erik G. Helzer's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers). Erik G. Helzer is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers). Erik G. Helzer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Erik G. Helzer's co-authors include David A. Pizarro, Eranda Jayawickreme, William Fleeson, R. Michael Furr, David Dunning, Marjorie A. Reed, Peter Meindl, Jennifer K. Connor-Smith, Laura E. R. Blackie and Maxwell Barranti and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Erik G. Helzer

26 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erik G. Helzer United States 16 310 300 254 165 107 26 725
Mike Prentice United States 19 524 1.7× 196 0.7× 317 1.2× 206 1.2× 142 1.3× 30 864
Ilmo van der Löwe United Kingdom 7 394 1.3× 153 0.5× 344 1.4× 163 1.0× 109 1.0× 8 730
Pascal Burgmer Germany 13 258 0.8× 210 0.7× 230 0.9× 99 0.6× 84 0.8× 28 563
Sarah E. Ainsworth United States 12 194 0.6× 200 0.7× 271 1.1× 74 0.4× 123 1.1× 19 625
Mario Weick United Kingdom 13 345 1.1× 148 0.5× 342 1.3× 103 0.6× 76 0.7× 34 629
Aaron C. Weidman United States 13 478 1.5× 121 0.4× 418 1.6× 242 1.5× 227 2.1× 24 974
Erin M. O’Mara United States 11 432 1.4× 98 0.3× 301 1.2× 169 1.0× 103 1.0× 19 634
Valerie Tiberius United States 14 312 1.0× 174 0.6× 138 0.5× 63 0.4× 94 0.9× 43 692
Victoria McGeer United States 16 275 0.9× 501 1.7× 262 1.0× 103 0.6× 160 1.5× 31 1.0k
Alessandro Gabbiadini Italy 19 265 0.9× 80 0.3× 357 1.4× 152 0.9× 69 0.6× 37 770

Countries citing papers authored by Erik G. Helzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik G. Helzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik G. Helzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik G. Helzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik G. Helzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik G. Helzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik G. Helzer. The network helps show where Erik G. Helzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erik G. Helzer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erik G. Helzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erik G. Helzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erik G. Helzer. Erik G. Helzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Helzer, Erik G., et al.. (2023). Moral beacons: Understanding moral character and moral influence. Journal of Personality. 92(3). 735–752. 7 indexed citations
2.
Cohen, Taya R., et al.. (2022). Honesty Among Lawyers: Moral Character, Game Framing, and Honest Disclosures in Negotiations. Negotiation Journal. 38(2). 199–234. 7 indexed citations
3.
Helzer, Erik G., Taya R. Cohen, & Yeonjeong Kim. (2022). The Character Lens: A Person-Centered Perspective on Moral Recognition and Ethical Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics. 182(2). 483–500. 14 indexed citations
4.
Helzer, Erik G., Christopher G. Myers, Christine Fahim, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, & James H. Abernathy. (2020). Gender Bias in Collaborative Medical Decision Making: Emergent Evidence. Academic Medicine. 95(10). 1524–1528. 18 indexed citations
5.
Helion, Chelsea, et al.. (2019). Asymmetric memory for harming versus being harmed.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 149(5). 889–900. 7 indexed citations
6.
Helzer, Erik G., et al.. (2018). Creativity for Workplace Well-Being. Academy of Management Perspectives. 33(2). 134–147. 33 indexed citations
7.
Duffy, Korrina A., et al.. (2018). Pessimistic expectations and poorer experiences: The role of (low) extraversion in anticipated and experienced enjoyment of social interaction. PLoS ONE. 13(7). e0199146–e0199146. 19 indexed citations
8.
Helzer, Erik G., Taya R. Cohen, & Yeonjeong Kim. (2018). The character lens: Moral character promotes ethical decision-making through moral awareness. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018(1). 17936–17936. 1 indexed citations
9.
Furr, R. Michael, et al.. (2016). Morality’s Centrality to Liking, Respecting, and Understanding Others. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 7(7). 648–657. 51 indexed citations
10.
Helzer, Erik G., William Fleeson, R. Michael Furr, Peter Meindl, & Maxwell Barranti. (2016). Once a Utilitarian, Consistently a Utilitarian? Examining Principledness in Moral Judgment via the Robustness of Individual Differences. Journal of Personality. 85(4). 505–517. 22 indexed citations
11.
Helzer, Erik G. & Eranda Jayawickreme. (2015). Control and the “Good Life”. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 6(6). 653–660. 25 indexed citations
12.
Fleeson, William, R. Michael Furr, Eranda Jayawickreme, Peter Meindl, & Erik G. Helzer. (2014). Character: The Prospects for a Personality‐Based Perspective on Morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 8(4). 178–191. 72 indexed citations
13.
Dunning, David & Erik G. Helzer. (2014). Beyond the Correlation Coefficient in Studies of Self-Assessment Accuracy: Commentary on Zell & Krizan (2014). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 9(2). 126–130. 18 indexed citations
14.
Helzer, Erik G., R. Michael Furr, Ashley Hawkins, et al.. (2014). Agreement on the Perception of Moral Character. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 40(12). 1698–1710. 45 indexed citations
15.
Helzer, Erik G., et al.. (2013). Prospection by Any Other Name? A Response to Seligman et al. (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8(2). 146–150. 12 indexed citations
16.
Helzer, Erik G. & Thomas Gilovich. (2012). Whatever Is Willed Will Be. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 38(10). 1235–1246. 20 indexed citations
17.
Helzer, Erik G. & David Dunning. (2012). Why and when peer prediction is superior to self-prediction: The weight given to future aspiration versus past achievement.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103(1). 38–53. 56 indexed citations
18.
Helzer, Erik G. & John A. Edwards. (2012). Causal Uncertainty Prompts Abstract Construal of Behavior. Social Cognition. 30(5). 519–536. 12 indexed citations
19.
Helzer, Erik G. & David A. Pizarro. (2011). Dirty Liberals!. Psychological Science. 22(4). 517–522. 141 indexed citations
20.
Helzer, Erik G., Jennifer K. Connor-Smith, & Marjorie A. Reed. (2008). Traits, states, and attentional gates: Temperament and threat relevance as predictors of attentional bias to social threat. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 22(1). 57–76. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026