Ilaria Stefanini
- Food Science top 5%
- Plant Science
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bruno BiavatiLorenzo NissenBarbara SgorbatiSilvia GrandiAndrea MontiAlessandro ZattaMonica ModestoMaria Rosaria D’Aimmo
- Topics
- Gut microbiota and health (6 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Ilaria Stefanini
11 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Food Science 148
- Plant Science 142
- Molecular Biology 131
- Pharmacology 104
- Animal Science and Zoology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Ilaria Stefanini
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilaria Stefanini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilaria Stefanini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilaria Stefanini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilaria Stefanini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilaria Stefanini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilaria Stefanini. The network helps show where Ilaria Stefanini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ilaria Stefanini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ilaria Stefanini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ilaria Stefanini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ilaria Stefanini. Ilaria Stefanini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 226 | |
| 8 | Antimicrobial effect of dietary nitrate in weaning piglets challenged or not with Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium | 1 |
| 9 | 71 | |
| 10 | Effect of probiotic inocula on the population density of lactic acid bacteria and enteric pathogens in the intestine of weaning piglets | 4 |
| 11 | Dietary nitrate: effects on the health of weaning pigs and antimicrobial activity on seven probiotic Bifidobacterium spp. strains. | 1 |
| 12 | 13 |
About Ilaria Stefanini
Ilaria Stefanini is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Clinical Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (148 citations), Pharmacology (104 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (60 citations). Ilaria Stefanini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Biavati, Lorenzo Nissen, Barbara Sgorbati, Silvia Grandi, Andrea Monti, Alessandro Zatta, Monica Modesto, Maria Rosaria D’Aimmo, Maurizio Mazzoni and Paolo Bosi. Their work appears in journals such as Materials, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY and Fitoterapia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.