Ikram Ullah Khan
- Marketing top 1%
- Information Systems and Management top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Co-authors
- Zahid HameedSafeer Ullah KhanZaryab SheikhTahir IslamRana Muhammad NaeemYugang YuSalman KhanYezheng Liu
- Topics
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (19 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (14 papers)Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (12 papers)
In The Last Decade
Ikram Ullah Khan
49 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Marketing 669
- Information Systems and Management 590
- Sociology and Political Science 575
- Strategy and Management 402
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 312
Countries citing papers authored by Ikram Ullah Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Ikram Ullah Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ikram Ullah Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ikram Ullah Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ikram Ullah Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ikram Ullah Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ikram Ullah Khan. The network helps show where Ikram Ullah Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ikram Ullah Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ikram Ullah Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ikram Ullah Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ikram Ullah Khan. Ikram Ullah Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 61 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Ikram Ullah Khan
Ikram Ullah Khan is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Marketing, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (19 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (14 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (590 citations), Marketing (669 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (312 citations). Ikram Ullah Khan has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, China and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Zahid Hameed, Safeer Ullah Khan, Zaryab Sheikh, Tahir Islam, Rana Muhammad Naeem, Yugang Yu, Salman Khan, Yezheng Liu, Sajjad Nawaz Khan and Rauf I Azam. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, International Journal of Hospitality Management and Current Issues in Tourism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.