Ian Taylor
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Public Administration top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Josie KellyAlberto RodríguezSiyuan DongMargaret KwekuJayne WebsterSusan L. BurnsNikhil Chavan-DafleMaria Bauzá
- Topics
- Soft Robotics and Applications (4 papers)Robot Manipulation and Learning (4 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGhana
In The Last Decade
Ian Taylor
15 papers receiving 366 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Biomedical Engineering 96
- Cognitive Neuroscience 95
- Public Administration 83
- Education 75
- Control and Systems Engineering 68
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Taylor
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Taylor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Taylor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Taylor. The network helps show where Ian Taylor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Taylor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Taylor. Ian Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | GelSlim 3.0: High-Resolution Measurement of Shape, Force and Slip in a Compact Tactile-Sensing Fingerbreakdown → | 131 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | The Limits of the African Peer Review Mechanism | 1 |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | 101 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Comparative developmental states in Africa: the call for a research agenda | 1 |
| 12 | The Failure of the New Economic Partnership for Africa's Development | 3 |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | An Introduction to Public Sector Management | 14 |
About Ian Taylor
Ian Taylor is a scholar working on Public Administration, Development and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soft Robotics and Applications (4 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (4 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (83 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (95 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (20 citations). Ian Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Josie Kelly, Alberto Rodríguez, Siyuan Dong, Margaret Kweku, Jayne Webster, Susan L. Burns, Nikhil Chavan-Dafle, Maria Bauzá, Neel Doshi and Julia Park. Their work appears in journals such as Science Robotics, Malaria Journal and Health & Social Care in the Community.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.