Ian D. Stephen
Impact in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 38
-
- Face Recognition and Perception 13
- Co-authors
- David I. Perrett (14 shared papers)Vinet Coetzee (9 shared papers)Richard J. Stevenson (17 shared papers)Kevin R. Brooks (22 shared papers)Jonathan Mond (13 shared papers)Michael Stirrat (2 shared papers)Miriam J. Smith (1 shared paper)Ian S. Penton‐Voak (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (8 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (8 papers)Evolution and Human Behavior (7 papers)Perception (6 papers)British Journal of Psychology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Ian D. Stephen
63 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
- Sensory Systems 308
- Marketing 350
- Cognitive Neuroscience 572
- Clinical Psychology 553
Countries citing papers authored by Ian D. Stephen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian D. Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian D. Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian D. Stephen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian D. Stephen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian D. Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian D. Stephen. The network helps show where Ian D. Stephen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian D. Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 143 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 135 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 132 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 111 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 99 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 88 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 83 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 32 |
About Ian D. Stephen
Ian D. Stephen is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Marketing, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (38 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (17 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (13 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (13 papers), Color perception and design (10 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (10 papers) and Skin Protection and Aging (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Sensory Systems (308 citations), Marketing (350 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (572 citations) and Clinical Psychology (553 citations). Ian D. Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include David I. Perrett, Vinet Coetzee, Richard J. Stevenson, Kevin R. Brooks, Jonathan Mond, Michael Stirrat, Miriam J. Smith, Ian S. Penton‐Voak, Nicholas Pound and Isabel M. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, Evolution and Human Behavior, Perception and British Journal of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.