Vinet Coetzee
Impact in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 19
-
- Color perception and design 7
- Co-authors
- David I. Perrett (20 shared papers)Ian D. Stephen (9 shared papers)Jaco M. Greeff (4 shared papers)Daniel E. Re (6 shared papers)Jingying Chen (1 shared paper)Bernard Tiddeman (5 shared papers)Carmen E. Lefevre (3 shared papers)Dengke Xiao (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (5 papers)Evolution and Human Behavior (3 papers)Biology Letters (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (2 papers)Perception (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaEstonia
In The Last Decade
Vinet Coetzee
29 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 858
- Sensory Systems 160
- Marketing 240
- Museology 54
- Cognitive Neuroscience 283
Countries citing papers authored by Vinet Coetzee
This map shows the geographic impact of Vinet Coetzee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vinet Coetzee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vinet Coetzee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vinet Coetzee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vinet Coetzee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vinet Coetzee. The network helps show where Vinet Coetzee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vinet Coetzee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 156 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 132 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 111 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 88 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 79 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 14 |
About Vinet Coetzee
Vinet Coetzee is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Marketing, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (19 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (5 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (858 citations), Sensory Systems (160 citations), Marketing (240 citations), Museology (54 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (283 citations). Vinet Coetzee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include David I. Perrett, Ian D. Stephen, Jaco M. Greeff, Daniel E. Re, Jingying Chen, Bernard Tiddeman, Carmen E. Lefevre, Dengke Xiao, Fhionna R. Moore and Indriķis Krams. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolution and Human Behavior, Biology Letters, Frontiers in Psychology and Perception.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.