Jane Goodman‐Delahunty

2.7k total citations
161 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Jane Goodman‐Delahunty is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Goodman‐Delahunty has authored 161 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 51 papers in Law and 50 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane Goodman‐Delahunty's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (40 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (38 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (32 papers). Jane Goodman‐Delahunty is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (40 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (38 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (32 papers). Jane Goodman‐Delahunty collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Jane Goodman‐Delahunty's co-authors include David Bright, Loene M. Howes, Natalie Martschuk, Mandeep K. Dhami, Anne Cossins, Diane Sivasubramaniam, Kelly L. Graham, Sandra Hale, Kate O’Brien and Siegfried L. Sporer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Psychologist and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Goodman‐Delahunty

144 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Goodman‐Delahunty Australia 21 731 465 432 412 310 161 1.7k
Bruce D. Sales United States 26 747 1.0× 466 1.0× 865 2.0× 216 0.5× 479 1.5× 132 2.2k
Regina A. Schuller Canada 20 646 0.9× 260 0.6× 260 0.6× 656 1.6× 347 1.1× 60 1.3k
Heather Strang United Kingdom 21 1.7k 2.3× 205 0.4× 904 2.1× 145 0.4× 198 0.6× 63 2.0k
Julian V. Roberts Canada 27 2.1k 2.8× 95 0.2× 852 2.0× 184 0.4× 456 1.5× 143 2.4k
Melody Sadler United States 15 1.0k 1.4× 454 1.0× 149 0.3× 146 0.4× 45 0.1× 26 1.4k
Amy Eshleman United States 9 1.4k 1.9× 927 2.0× 299 0.7× 357 0.9× 32 0.1× 14 1.9k
Brandon K. Applegäte United States 22 1.8k 2.5× 108 0.2× 851 2.0× 143 0.3× 114 0.4× 68 2.1k
William T. L. Cox United States 13 833 1.1× 453 1.0× 170 0.4× 386 0.9× 30 0.1× 18 1.5k
Rebecca L. Stotzer United States 19 656 0.9× 822 1.8× 436 1.0× 473 1.1× 35 0.1× 43 1.4k
Stephanie Madon United States 22 772 1.1× 818 1.8× 460 1.1× 246 0.6× 46 0.1× 57 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Goodman‐Delahunty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Goodman‐Delahunty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Goodman‐Delahunty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Goodman‐Delahunty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Goodman‐Delahunty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. The network helps show where Jane Goodman‐Delahunty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Goodman‐Delahunty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Goodman‐Delahunty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. Jane Goodman‐Delahunty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sivasubramaniam, Diane, et al.. (2025). Evaluations of procedural justice: what drives practitioners’ support for interview procedures?. Psychology Crime and Law. 1–21.
2.
Martschuk, Natalie, et al.. (2024). Remote Witnesses: Improving Their Experience of Technology, Orientation and Environment When Participating via Audio-Visual Links. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 29(2). 144–163.
3.
Hale, Sandra, et al.. (2024). Juror perceptions in bilingual interpreted trials. Perspectives. 33(5). 946–969. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cashmore, Judy, et al.. (2020). The Decision to Prosecute: A Comparative Analysis of Australian Prosecutorial Guidelines. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 44(3). 155–172. 4 indexed citations
5.
Dhami, Mandeep K., et al.. (2020). Disengaging and Rehabilitating High-Value Detainees: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
6.
Westera, Nina, Martine B. Powell, Rachel Zajac, & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2019). Courtroom Questioning of Child Sexual Abuse Complainants: Views of Australian Criminal Justice Professionals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
7.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2019). Procedural Justice and Complaints about Police. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4 indexed citations
8.
Sivasubramaniam, Diane & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2019). International consensus on effective and ineffective interviewing strategies: a survey of experienced practitioners. Police Practice and Research. 22(1). 921–937. 8 indexed citations
9.
Powell, Martine B., et al.. (2019). Discussions about child witness interviews during Australian trials of child sexual abuse. Police Practice and Research. 22(1). 938–952.
10.
Sharman, Stefanie J., et al.. (2019). Association between Interview Quality and Child Sexual Abuse Trial Outcome. Journal of Family Violence. 35(4). 395–403. 5 indexed citations
11.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2017). What Australian jurors know and do not know about evidence in child sexual abuse. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 41. 86–103. 6 indexed citations
12.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane & Natalie Martschuk. (2016). Risks and benefits of interpreter-mediated police interviews. University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor). 9 indexed citations
13.
Howes, Loene M. & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2015). Teachers' career decisions: Perspectives on choosing teaching careers, and on staying or leaving. Issues in educational research. 25(1). 18–35. 43 indexed citations
14.
Howes, Loene M. & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2014). Career decisions by Australian police officers: a cross-section of perspectives on entering, staying in and leaving policing careers. Police Practice and Research. 16(6). 453–468. 21 indexed citations
15.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2013). Question trails in trials: structured versus unstructured juror decision making. 37(114). 114–136. 3 indexed citations
16.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2013). The Impact of Organizational Information Culture on Information Use Outcomes in Policing: An Exploratory Study. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 18(4). 1–28. 8 indexed citations
17.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2010). Reality, Fantasy and the Truth about CSI Effects. Psychosomatics. 32(4). 18–19. 3 indexed citations
18.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2008). Factors affecting juror satisfaction and confidence in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. 1–6. 11 indexed citations
19.
Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, Neil Brewer, Jonathan Clough, et al.. (2008). Practices, policies and procedures that influence juror satisfaction in Australia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
20.
Bersoff, Donald N., et al.. (1997). Training in law and psychology: Models from the Villanova conference.. American Psychologist. 52(12). 1301–1310. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bruce D. Sales Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Regina A. Schuller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heather Strang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julian V. Roberts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melody Sadler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy Eshleman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brandon K. Applegäte Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William T. L. Cox Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca L. Stotzer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephanie Madon
Rankless by CCL
2026