Iain S. Maclean
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology
- Ecology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers)
- Journals
- Applied Vegetation ScienceSixteenth Century JournalInternational Journal of Aviation Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Iain S. Maclean
13 papers receiving 143 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Sociology and Political Science 56
- Anthropology 26
- Ecology 24
- Economics and Econometrics 18
- Political Science and International Relations 16
Countries citing papers authored by Iain S. Maclean
This map shows the geographic impact of Iain S. Maclean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iain S. Maclean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iain S. Maclean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Iain S. Maclean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iain S. Maclean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iain S. Maclean. The network helps show where Iain S. Maclean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iain S. Maclean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iain S. Maclean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iain S. Maclean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Iain S. Maclean. Iain S. Maclean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | C. S. Lewis: Life, Works and Legacy | 4 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Why This New Race? Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | The Fourth Great Awakening and the Future of Egalitarianism | 68 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Final Report | 0 |
| 15 | Opting for Democracy?: Liberation Theology and the Struggle for Democracy in Brazil | 2 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Iain S. Maclean
Iain S. Maclean is a scholar working on Religious studies, History and Philosophy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (26 citations), Religious studies (13 citations) and Cultural Studies (13 citations). Iain S. Maclean has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Bellamy, Murray C. Grant, Nick Rushby and Robert Stevenson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Vegetation Science, Sixteenth Century Journal and International Journal of Aviation Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.