I. Joó
Impact in
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
- Numerical Analysis top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Differential Equations and Boundary Problems 9
- Mathematical functions and polynomials 8
-
- Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics 6
- Co-authors
- P. Erdös (3 shared papers)F. Glück (4 shared papers)Miklós Horváth (2 shared papers)J. Last (1 shared paper)A Kahán (1 shared paper)Sergei Avdonin (1 shared paper)B Lányi (1 shared paper)José Luís Mate (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
I. Joó
80 papers receiving 412 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Mathematical Physics 99
- Numerical Analysis 41
- Endocrinology 39
- Microbiology 47
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 107
Countries citing papers authored by I. Joó
This map shows the geographic impact of I. Joó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Joó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Joó more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. Joó
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Joó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Joó. The network helps show where I. Joó may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside I. Joó, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 41 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 14 | |
| 8 | The porphyrin content of harderian glands in rats and the melatonin-melanocyte stimulating hormone-system. | 1975 | 14 |
| 9 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 11 | Antigens of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their use in immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy. | 1985 | 12 |
| 12 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1960 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 19 | Epidemiology of pertussis in Hungary. | 1991 | 6 |
| 20 | 1989 | 6 |
About I. Joó
I. Joó is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Endocrinology, Microbiology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 98 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vibrio bacteria research studies (10 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (9 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (9 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (8 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (7 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (6 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (6 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (99 citations), Numerical Analysis (41 citations), Endocrinology (39 citations), Microbiology (47 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (107 citations). I. Joó has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Slovakia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include P. Erdös, F. Glück, Miklós Horváth, J. Last, A Kahán, Sergei Avdonin, B Lányi, José Luís Mate, Paul Erdős and Domonkos Tikk. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, Tectonophysics, Computer Physics Communications, Pathobiology and Vaccine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.