F. Glück

3.0k total citations
49 papers, 793 citations indexed

About

F. Glück is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Glück has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 793 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 27 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 7 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in F. Glück's work include Neutrino Physics Research (32 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (21 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (19 papers). F. Glück is often cited by papers focused on Neutrino Physics Research (32 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (21 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (19 papers). F. Glück collaborates with scholars based in Hungary, Germany and United States. F. Glück's co-authors include O. Zimmer, H. Abele, S. Baeßler, I. Joó, S. Mertens, W. Heil, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, D. Dubbers, U. Müller and M. Hoffmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Computer Physics Communications.

In The Last Decade

F. Glück

48 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Glück Hungary 17 636 430 149 75 33 49 793
K. Bodek Poland 19 726 1.1× 481 1.1× 239 1.6× 73 1.0× 13 0.4× 81 891
G. Audit France 18 751 1.2× 239 0.6× 103 0.7× 51 0.7× 13 0.4× 41 846
G. Puddu Italy 8 434 0.7× 281 0.7× 118 0.8× 96 1.3× 14 0.4× 25 508
R. Henderson Canada 14 529 0.8× 218 0.5× 125 0.8× 58 0.8× 68 2.1× 36 576
W. Boeglin United States 13 456 0.7× 200 0.5× 88 0.6× 38 0.5× 66 2.0× 27 504
A. Trudel Canada 11 440 0.7× 219 0.5× 86 0.6× 40 0.5× 70 2.1× 35 490
J. R. Vanhoy United States 13 302 0.5× 197 0.5× 150 1.0× 52 0.7× 11 0.3× 42 380
C. Wrede United States 16 555 0.9× 199 0.5× 162 1.1× 42 0.6× 65 2.0× 49 598
S.D. Hoath United Kingdom 16 424 0.7× 228 0.5× 155 1.0× 40 0.5× 17 0.5× 30 541
R. Neveling South Africa 14 473 0.7× 255 0.6× 86 0.6× 90 1.2× 21 0.6× 45 525

Countries citing papers authored by F. Glück

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Glück's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Glück with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Glück more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Glück

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Glück. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Glück. The network helps show where F. Glück may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Glück

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Glück. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Glück based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Glück. F. Glück is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wietfeldt, F. E., B. Collett, M. S. Dewey, et al.. (2024). Recoil-order and radiative corrections to the aCORN experiment. Physical review. C. 110(1).
2.
Beck, M., W. Heil, Ch. Schmidt, et al.. (2024). Reanalysis of the βν¯e Angular Correlation Measurement from the aSPECT Experiment with New Constraints on Fierz Interference. Physical Review Letters. 132(10). 102501–102501. 5 indexed citations
3.
Glück, F.. (2023). Radiative corrections to neutron and nuclear β-decays: a serious kinematics problem in the literature. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(9). 5 indexed citations
4.
Severijns, N., et al.. (2022). Influence of the recoil-order and radiative correction on the β decay correlation coefficients in mirror decays. Physical review. C. 106(1). 6 indexed citations
5.
Kuckert, L., F. Heizmann, F. Glück, et al.. (2018). Modelling of gas dynamical properties of the Katrin tritium source and implications for the neutrino mass measurement. Vacuum. 158. 195–205. 5 indexed citations
6.
Erhard, M., J. Behrens, Stephan Bauer, et al.. (2018). Technical design and commissioning of the KATRIN large-volume air coil system. Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
7.
Klein, Manuel & F. Glück. (2017). Tritium ion blocking and detection in the KATRIN experiment. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 888. 12073–12073. 2 indexed citations
8.
Mertens, S., T. Lasserre, Stefan Groh, et al.. (2015). Sensitivity of next-generation tritium beta-decay experiments for keV-scale sterile neutrinos. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2015(2). 20–20. 49 indexed citations
9.
Prall, M., F. Glück, A. Beglarian, et al.. (2012). The KATRIN pre-spectrometer at reduced filter energy. New Journal of Physics. 14(7). 73054–73054. 15 indexed citations
10.
Glück, F.. (2011). AXISYMMETRIC MAGNETIC FIELD CALCULATION WITH ZONAL HARMONIC EXPANSION. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B. 32. 351–388. 16 indexed citations
11.
Beck, M., В. Козлов, M. Breitenfeldt, et al.. (2011). First detection and energy measurement of recoil ions following beta decay in a Penning trap with the WITCH experiment. The European Physical Journal A. 47(3). 13 indexed citations
12.
Fränkle, F. M., L. Bornschein, G. Drexlin, et al.. (2011). Radon induced background processes in the KATRIN pre-spectrometer. Astroparticle Physics. 35(3). 128–134. 16 indexed citations
13.
Bonn, J., et al.. (2011). The KATRIN sensitivity to the neutrino mass and to right-handed currents in beta decay. Physics Letters B. 703(3). 310–312. 8 indexed citations
14.
Schümann, M., Michael Kreuz, M. Deissenroth, et al.. (2008). Measurement of the Proton Asymmetry Parameter in Neutron Beta Decay. Physical Review Letters. 100(15). 151801–151801. 31 indexed citations
15.
Schümann, M., T. Söldner, M. Deissenroth, et al.. (2007). Measurement of the Neutrino Asymmetry ParameterBin Neutron Decay. Physical Review Letters. 99(19). 191803–191803. 43 indexed citations
16.
Abele, H., M. Deissenroth, F. Glück, et al.. (2005). The beta-, neutrino- and proton-asymmetry in neutron beta-decay. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 110(4). 377–377. 1 indexed citations
17.
Abele, H., M. Hoffmann, S. Baeßler, et al.. (2002). Is the Unitarity of the Quark-Mixing CKM Matrix Violated in Neutronβ-Decay?. Physical Review Letters. 88(21). 211801–211801. 108 indexed citations
18.
Glück, F.. (1998). Electron spectra and electron-proton asymmetries in polarized neutron decay. Physics Letters B. 436(1-2). 25–32. 16 indexed citations
19.
Glück, F., et al.. (1992). Order-αradiative corrections for semileptonic decays of polarized baryons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 46(5). 2090–2101. 41 indexed citations
20.
Glück, F., et al.. (1990). Order-αradiative corrections for semileptonic decays of unpolarized baryons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 41(7). 2160–2173. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026