I. John
Impact in
- Software top 5%
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research
- Information Systems top 5%
- Software Engineering Research
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Software Engineering Research 6
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 3
- Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services 1
-
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 6
- Co-authors
- Bernd Freimut (1 shared paper)Teade Punter (1 shared paper)Marcus Ciolkowski (1 shared paper)Dirk Muthig (3 shared papers)Klaus Schmid (2 shared papers)Jens Knodel (3 shared papers)Klaus Müller (1 shared paper)G. S. Heller (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- IEEE Software (1 paper)Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandSpain
In The Last Decade
I. John
7 papers receiving 252 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Software 58
- Information Systems 234
- Computer Science Applications 48
- Artificial Intelligence 162
- Management Information Systems 30
Countries citing papers authored by I. John
This map shows the geographic impact of I. John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. John more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. John
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. John. The network helps show where I. John may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside I. John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 8 |
About I. John
I. John is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Information Systems and Information Systems and Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper), Software System Performance and Reliability (1 paper), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (1 paper) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (58 citations), Information Systems (234 citations), Computer Science Applications (48 citations), Artificial Intelligence (162 citations) and Management Information Systems (30 citations). I. John has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Freimut, Teade Punter, Marcus Ciolkowski, Dirk Muthig, Klaus Schmid, Jens Knodel, Klaus Müller, G. S. Heller, Andreas Birk and Martin Pinzger. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Software and Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.