Jens Knodel

830 total citations
41 papers, 550 citations indexed

About

Jens Knodel is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Knodel has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 550 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Information Systems, 33 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 13 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Jens Knodel's work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (33 papers), Software Engineering Research (30 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (14 papers). Jens Knodel is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (33 papers), Software Engineering Research (30 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (14 papers). Jens Knodel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Jens Knodel's co-authors include Dirk Muthig, Matthias Naab, Daniel Popescu, Mikael Lindvall, Slawomir Duszynski, Martin Becker, I. John, Dharmalingam Ganesan, Martin Pinzger and Masakazu Adachi and has published in prestigious journals such as Empirical Software Engineering, Annals of Intensive Care and Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science.

In The Last Decade

Jens Knodel

40 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Jens Knodel

CNC

SOFTW

CSA

K.C. Kang South Korea

Matthias Riebisch Germany

Sandro Schulze Germany

Michał Antkiewicz Canada

Mathieu Acher France

Patrick Donohoe United States

Séverine Sentilles Sweden

Alexander Ran United States

Steven Woods United States

Eelco Rommes Netherlands

K.C. Kang South Korea

Jens Knodel

398 ×0.8

383 ×0.9

123 ×0.6

CNC

141 ×1.2

SOFTW

18 ×0.6

CSA

Citations per year, relative to Jens Knodel Jens Knodel (= 1×) peers K.C. Kang

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Knodel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Knodel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Knodel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Knodel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Knodel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Knodel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Knodel. The network helps show where Jens Knodel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Knodel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Knodel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Knodel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Knodel. Jens Knodel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Knodel, Jens & Matthias Naab. (2017). How to Evaluate Software Architectures: Tutorial on Practical Insights on Architecture Evaluation Projects with Industrial Customers. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 183–184. 2 indexed citations

Knodel, Jens & Matthias Naab. (2014). Software Architecture Evaluation in Practice: Retrospective on More Than 50 Architecture Evaluations in Industry. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 115–124. 8 indexed citations

Knodel, Jens, et al.. (2014). Supporting Architects in Mastering the Complexity of Open Software Ecosystems. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1–6. 1 indexed citations

Knodel, Jens & Matthias Naab. (2014). Mitigating the Risk of software change in practice: Retrospective on more than 50 architecture evaluations in industry (Keynote paper). Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 2–17. 4 indexed citations

Förster, Thomas, et al.. (2013). Recovering Component Dependencies Hidden by Frameworks--Experiences from Analyzing OSGi and Qt. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 7. 295–304. 1 indexed citations

Knodel, Jens, et al.. (2012). Architecture Engagement Purposes: Towards a Framework for Planning "Just Enough"-Architecting in Software Engineering. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 234–238. 5 indexed citations

Duszynski, Slawomir, Jens Knodel, & Mikael Lindvall. (2009). SAVE: Software Architecture Visualization and Evaluation. 31 indexed citations

Knodel, Jens & Dirk Muthig. (2008). A Decade of Reverse Engineering at Fraunhofer IESE – The Changing Role of Reverse Engineering in Applied Research. Annals of Intensive Care. 9(1). 134–143. 2 indexed citations

Knodel, Jens, et al.. (2008). Providing Feedback from Application to Family Engineering - The Product Line Planning Game at the Testo AG. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 180–189. 17 indexed citations

10.

Lindvall, Mikael, et al.. (2008). Using Sequence Diagrams to Detect Communication Problems between Systems. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1–11. 5 indexed citations

11.

Duszynski, Slawomir, et al.. (2008). Variant Comparison - A Technique for Visualizing Software Variants. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 229–233. 9 indexed citations

12.

Ganesan, Dharmalingam, et al.. (2007). Comparing Costs and Benefits of Different Test Strategies for a Software Product Line: A Study from Testo AG. 74–83. 19 indexed citations

13.

Ganesan, Dharmalingam, et al.. (2007). Comparing Costs and Benefits of Different Test Strategies for a Software Product Line: A Study from Testo AG. 3 indexed citations

14.

Ganesan, Dharmalingam, et al.. (2007). Comparing Costs and Benefits of Different Test Strategies for a Software Product Line: A Study from Testo AG. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 74–83. 11 indexed citations

15.

Knodel, Jens, Dirk Muthig, & Matthias Naab. (2006). Understanding Software Architectures by Visualization--An Experiment with Graphical Elements. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 39–50. 12 indexed citations

16.

Knodel, Jens, Mikael Lindvall, Dirk Muthig, & Matthias Naab. (2006). Static evaluation of software architectures. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 10 pp.–294. 72 indexed citations

17.

John, I., et al.. (2006). A practical guide to product line scoping. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 3–12. 40 indexed citations

18.

Knodel, Jens, et al.. (2006). Asset Recovery and Their Incorporation into Product Lines. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 120–129. 11 indexed citations

19.

Pinzger, Martin, et al.. (2003). Architecture Recovery for Product Families. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 2 indexed citations

20.

Knodel, Jens. (2003). Reconstruction of Architectural Views by Design Hypothesis.. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 23. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact