Hugh Dove
Impact in
- Forestry top 0.2%
- Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 0.2%
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Papers in
-
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology 60
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 2
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 1
- Forestry 17
- Pasture and Agricultural Systems 17
- Co-authors
- R.W. Mayes (10 shared papers)M. Freer (17 shared papers)Andrew D. Moore (7 shared papers)Walter M. Kelman (15 shared papers)John A. Kirkegaard (8 shared papers)R. H. King (5 shared papers)Matthew Tom Harrison (4 shared papers)John R. Evans (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Hugh Dove
103 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hugh Dove's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Forestry 454
- Agronomy and Crop Science 1.5k
- Equine 45
- Animal Science and Zoology 182
- Small Animals 74
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Dove
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Dove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Dove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Dove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Dove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Dove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Dove. The network helps show where Hugh Dove may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hugh Dove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 369 |
| 2 | 1996 | 211 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 163 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 136 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 132 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 112 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 112 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 95 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 95 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 88 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 82 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 77 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 66 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 62 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 57 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 54 |
About Hugh Dove
Hugh Dove is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry, Animal Science and Zoology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Equine, having authored 109 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (60 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (17 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Plant Virus Research Studies (1 paper) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (454 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (1.5k citations), Equine (45 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (182 citations) and Small Animals (74 citations). Hugh Dove has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R.W. Mayes, M. Freer, Andrew D. Moore, Walter M. Kelman, John A. Kirkegaard, R. H. King, Matthew Tom Harrison, John R. Evans, Susan J. Sprague and S. J. Cork. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, Animal Production Science, The Journal of Agricultural Science, Animal Science and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.