Hsing‐fen Lee

525 total citations
10 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Hsing‐fen Lee is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Hsing‐fen Lee has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Strategy and Management, 4 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 2 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Hsing‐fen Lee's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers). Hsing‐fen Lee is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers). Hsing‐fen Lee collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Hsing‐fen Lee's co-authors include Marcela Miozzo, Panos Desyllas, Ian Miles, Philippe Larédo, Naqib Ullah Khan, Huifen Cai, Ming‐Huei Chen and Yuan‐Chieh Chang and has published in prestigious journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Environmental Management and Technovation.

In The Last Decade

Hsing‐fen Lee

8 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hsing‐fen Lee United Kingdom 6 201 116 94 48 40 10 359
Atsushi Ohyama United States 10 151 0.8× 240 2.1× 150 1.6× 23 0.5× 28 0.7× 19 469
Augustine Awuah Peprah Ghana 10 122 0.6× 60 0.5× 75 0.8× 36 0.8× 56 1.4× 20 341
Valmir Emil Hoffmann Brazil 12 223 1.1× 60 0.5× 73 0.8× 44 0.9× 16 0.4× 79 462
Eva A. Alfoldi United Kingdom 4 173 0.9× 53 0.5× 62 0.7× 21 0.4× 24 0.6× 6 368
Jan‐Michael Ross United Kingdom 8 161 0.8× 137 1.2× 105 1.1× 32 0.7× 8 0.2× 14 380
Teresa Hogan Ireland 10 155 0.8× 254 2.2× 122 1.3× 53 1.1× 10 0.3× 23 596
Paul Grimshaw United Kingdom 7 159 0.8× 49 0.4× 131 1.4× 12 0.3× 21 0.5× 9 304
Miren Larrea Spain 10 100 0.5× 109 0.9× 138 1.5× 24 0.5× 26 0.7× 35 381
Samuel Garrett-Jones Australia 10 146 0.7× 82 0.7× 110 1.2× 14 0.3× 15 0.4× 33 337
Lawrence Arokiasamy Malaysia 9 121 0.6× 69 0.6× 47 0.5× 36 0.8× 14 0.3× 28 415

Countries citing papers authored by Hsing‐fen Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hsing‐fen Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsing‐fen Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsing‐fen Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hsing‐fen Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsing‐fen Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsing‐fen Lee. The network helps show where Hsing‐fen Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hsing‐fen Lee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hsing‐fen Lee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hsing‐fen Lee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hsing‐fen Lee. Hsing‐fen Lee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Cai, Huifen, et al.. (2024). Are natural resources a curse, a blessing, or a double-edged sword? Implications for environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management. 367. 122008–122008. 7 indexed citations
3.
Desyllas, Panos, et al.. (2023). Customization, Innovation and the Particularization Trap: Evidence from Knowledge-intensive Firms. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2023(1).
4.
Lee, Hsing‐fen & Marcela Miozzo. (2019). Which types of knowledge-intensive business services firms collaborate with universities for innovation?. Research Policy. 48(7). 1633–1646. 69 indexed citations
5.
Desyllas, Panos, Marcela Miozzo, Hsing‐fen Lee, & Ian Miles. (2018). Capturing Value from Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Service Firms: The Role of Competitive Strategy. British Journal of Management. 29(4). 769–795. 44 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Hsing‐fen & Marcela Miozzo. (2017). Which Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Firms Collaborate for Innovation with Universities?. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 12965–12965. 1 indexed citations
7.
Miozzo, Marcela, Panos Desyllas, Hsing‐fen Lee, & Ian Miles. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy. 45(7). 1337–1351. 125 indexed citations
8.
Chang, Yuan‐Chieh, et al.. (2014). Ambidextrous innovation capabilities, antecedents and performance. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. 840–850. 1 indexed citations
9.
Lee, Hsing‐fen & Marcela Miozzo. (2014). How does working on university–industry collaborative projects affect science and engineering doctorates’ careers? Evidence from a UK research-based university. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 40(2). 293–317. 22 indexed citations
10.
Lee, Hsing‐fen, Marcela Miozzo, & Philippe Larédo. (2010). Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Research Policy. 39(7). 869–881. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026