Hongjun Chen

619 citations
58 papers · 371 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Hongjun Chen

48 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Hongjun Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 53
  • Social Psychology 49
  • Strategy and Management 33
Replace Tim Taylor with:
Tim Taylor United Kingdom
Sergio A. Navarro-Tuch Mexico
Yuling Hsu Taiwan
Linghao Zhang China
Eli Silk United States
Matthew Pike China
J.L. Arnott United Kingdom
Naveen Kumar India
Sittichai Kaewkuekool Thailand
Ricardo Sosa New Zealand
Hongjun Chen relative to Tim Taylor United Kingdom Tim Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Tim Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hongjun Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hongjun Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hongjun Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hongjun Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hongjun Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hongjun Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hongjun Chen. The network helps show where Hongjun Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hongjun Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hongjun Chen Line = papers co-authored together Hongjun Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201856
2 201938
3 202126
4 201323
5 200515
6 201014
7 200513
8 200813
9 202211
10 201811
11 202311
12 201310
13 20079
14 20138
15 20248
16 20188
17 20048
18 20187
19 20226
20 20196

About Hongjun Chen

Hongjun Chen is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (14 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (6 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (4 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (3 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (27 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (53 citations), Social Psychology (49 citations) and Strategy and Management (33 citations). Hongjun Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Huili Wang, Fengyu Cong, Lili Tian, Ning Xi, Tiina Parviainen, Bingtuan Gao, Weihua Sheng, Jianlin Wu, Xiaohua Zhang and Paavo H. T. Leppänen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurolinguistics, eLife, Brain and Language, Frontiers in Psychology and Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact