Henry Nash Smith
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 17
- American Literature and Humor Studies 16
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
- History top 1%
- American Sports and Literature 13
- American Literature and Culture 4
- Music top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
-
- American Environmental and Regional History 5
-
- Archaeology and Natural History 3
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- Co-authors
- R. W. B. LewisJohn T. FlanaganRichard SlotkinPaul J. CarterMark TwainMerrill D. PetersonJames D. HartWilliam Dean Howells
- Journals
- The Lancet (1 paper)The American Historical Review (4 papers)College Composition and Communication (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaIreland
In The Last Decade
Henry Nash Smith
35 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Literature and Literary Theory 212
- History 133
- Music 19
- Cultural Studies 49
- Philosophy 58
Countries citing papers authored by Henry Nash Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Nash Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Nash Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Nash Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Nash Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Nash Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Nash Smith. The network helps show where Henry Nash Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Henry Nash Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 2 | Hurdles to asepsis, universal literacy, and chronobiology-all to be overcome. | 2000 | 10 |
| 3 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 4 | American literature, culture, and ideology : essays in memory of Henry Nash Smith | 1990 | 0 |
| 5 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1969 | 67 | |
| 9 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1964 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 14 | 'That hideous mistake of poor Clemens's' | 1955 | 3 |
| 15 | 1954 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1953 | 1 | |
| 17 | The West as an image of the American past | 1951 | 1 |
| 18 | 1951 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1951 | 79 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 19 |
About Henry Nash Smith
Henry Nash Smith is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Anthropology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (17 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (16 papers), American Sports and Literature (13 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), American Literature and Culture (4 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (212 citations), History (133 citations) and Music (19 citations). Henry Nash Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include R. W. B. Lewis, John T. Flanagan, Richard Slotkin, Paul J. Carter, Mark Twain, Merrill D. Peterson, James D. Hart, William Dean Howells, Ralph H. Gabriel and James M. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The American Historical Review and College Composition and Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.