Henry Nash Smith

3.5k citations
54 papers · 587 indexed · h-index 14

Henry Nash Smith

35 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Henry Nash Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Literature and Literary Theory 212
  • History 133
  • Music 19
  • Cultural Studies 49
  • Philosophy 58
Replace Beverly R. Voloshin with:
Beverly R. Voloshin United States
Philip F. Gura United States
Judith Fetterley United States
Melvin J. Friedman United States
Α. Owen Aldridge United States
Herman Melville
Larzer Ziff United States
David Grimsted United States
Ross Posnock United States
Jean Fagan Yellin United States
Henry Nash Smith relative to Beverly R. Voloshin United States Beverly R. Voloshin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Beverly R. Voloshin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Henry Nash Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Nash Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Nash Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Nash Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Nash Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Nash Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Nash Smith. The network helps show where Henry Nash Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Henry Nash Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Henry Nash Smith Line = papers co-authored together Henry Nash Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20000
2
Hurdles to asepsis, universal literacy, and chronobiology-all to be overcome.
200010
3 19911
4
American literature, culture, and ideology : essays in memory of Henry Nash Smith
19900
5 19795
6 197427
7 197412
8 196967
9 19684
10 19670
11 19640
12 19571
13 19572
14
'That hideous mistake of poor Clemens's'
19553
15 19541
16 19531
17
The West as an image of the American past
19511
18 195111
19 195179
20 195119

About Henry Nash Smith

Henry Nash Smith is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Anthropology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (17 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (16 papers), American Sports and Literature (13 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), American Literature and Culture (4 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (212 citations), History (133 citations) and Music (19 citations). Henry Nash Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include R. W. B. Lewis, John T. Flanagan, Richard Slotkin, Paul J. Carter, Mark Twain, Merrill D. Peterson, James D. Hart, William Dean Howells, Ralph H. Gabriel and James M. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The American Historical Review and College Composition and Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026