Henk Verhoog
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- E. Lammerts Van BuerenTon BaarsJ. de WitMichel A. HaringP.C. StruikHelena RöcklinsbergSusanne PadelMary Midgley
- Topics
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers)Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers)Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (4 papers)
- Journals
- Trends in biotechnologyNJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life SciencesJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Henk Verhoog
18 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Plant Science 257
- Ecology 107
- Genetics 107
- Molecular Biology 81
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72
Countries citing papers authored by Henk Verhoog
This map shows the geographic impact of Henk Verhoog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henk Verhoog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henk Verhoog more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henk Verhoog
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henk Verhoog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henk Verhoog. The network helps show where Henk Verhoog may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henk Verhoog
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henk Verhoog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henk Verhoog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henk Verhoog. Henk Verhoog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Balancing and integrating basic values in the development of organic regulations and standards: proposal for a procedure using case studies of conflicting areas | 12 |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 75 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 130 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | [Ethical aspects of animal experimentation] | 12 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | The scientific perception of animals as object. | 3 |
| 15 | Het maakbare dier : ethiek en transgene dieren | 2 |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 6 |
About Henk Verhoog
Henk Verhoog is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Small Animals and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (72 citations), Small Animals (58 citations) and Plant Science (257 citations). Henk Verhoog has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include E. Lammerts Van Bueren, Ton Baars, J. de Wit, Michel A. Haring, P.C. Struik, Helena Röcklinsberg, Susanne Padel, Mary Midgley, Susan D. Healy and Donald M. Broom. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in biotechnology, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences and Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.