J. de Wit

729 total citations
29 papers, 492 citations indexed

About

J. de Wit is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. de Wit has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 492 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 5 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in J. de Wit's work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (5 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers) and Agricultural Systems and Practices (3 papers). J. de Wit is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (5 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers) and Agricultural Systems and Practices (3 papers). J. de Wit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. J. de Wit's co-authors include Henk Verhoog, N.J.M. van Eekeren, Masayasu Asai, Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, Guillaume Martin, Marc Moraine, Julie Ryschawy, Natasja Oerlemans, Chris Koopmans and Jan Willem Erisman and has published in prestigious journals such as Land Use Policy, Animal Feed Science and Technology and Applied Soil Ecology.

In The Last Decade

J. de Wit

27 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. de Wit Netherlands	10	154	134	91	69	63	29	492
Angelika Wurbs Germany	10	214 1.4×	59 0.4×	134 1.5×	56 0.8×	58 0.9×	20	578
Vibeke Langer Denmark	14	239 1.6×	261 1.9×	144 1.6×	43 0.6×	80 1.3×	33	629
S.J. Quashie-Sam Canada	6	95 0.6×	69 0.5×	74 0.8×	46 0.7×	56 0.9×	11	420
Anne-Marie Izac United States	5	128 0.8×	94 0.7×	208 2.3×	37 0.5×	75 1.2×	5	573
Carlos E. González-Esquivel Mexico	16	367 2.4×	98 0.7×	149 1.6×	57 0.8×	89 1.4×	50	833
Jonathan Jones United Kingdom	3	239 1.6×	146 1.1×	179 2.0×	64 0.9×	84 1.3×	5	627
Helga Willer Switzerland	14	498 3.2×	122 0.9×	167 1.8×	60 0.9×	77 1.2×	112	843
Anselme Adégbidi Benin	13	155 1.0×	95 0.7×	112 1.2×	26 0.4×	147 2.3×	37	627
Jürn Sanders Germany	9	244 1.6×	141 1.1×	145 1.6×	40 0.6×	31 0.5×	41	450
Florence Jacquet France	14	279 1.8×	80 0.6×	252 2.8×	68 1.0×	126 2.0×	31	825

Countries citing papers authored by J. de Wit

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. de Wit

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. de Wit. The network helps show where J. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. de Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. de Wit. J. de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Flores, Angeles, et al.. (2021). The Critical Need to Build a European Governance Model for Online Access to Medical Information Services: A Position Paper. Pharmaceutical Medicine. 35(3). 147–155. 2 indexed citations

Milligan, James, et al.. (2020). Principles and Considerations for Responsible Sharing of Safety Information Via the Medical Information Channel. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 54(4). 939–946. 1 indexed citations

Wit, J. de, et al.. (2019). To Surf or Not To Surf? - Accessing Reliable, Accurate Medical Information. Journal of General Practice. 7(2). 1–5. 1 indexed citations

Nuijten, Edwin, et al.. (2017). Understanding obstacles and opportunities for successful market introduction of crop varieties with resistance against major diseases. Organic Agriculture. 8(4). 285–299. 16 indexed citations

Erisman, Jan Willem, N.J.M. van Eekeren, J. de Wit, et al.. (2016). Agriculture and biodiversity: a better balance benefits both. AIMS Agriculture and Food. 1(2). 157–174. 87 indexed citations

Eekeren, N.J.M. van, et al.. (2015). White clover content and grassland productivity in simulated grazing systems. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 484–486. 1 indexed citations

Wauters, Erwin, et al.. (2011). The foregone risk premium: a communicative and practical method for the evaluation of risk-return profiles in agriculture. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1–12. 2 indexed citations

Wit, J. de, et al.. (2008). Feed composition and strategies to improve poly-unsaturated fatty acid levels in organic cow milk. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 760–763. 1 indexed citations

Huber, Machteld, et al.. (2008). Comparison of Organic and Conventional Raw Milk Quality in The Netherlands. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 26(1). 69–83. 34 indexed citations

10.

Wit, J. de & Henk Verhoog. (2007). Organic values and the conventionalization of organic agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 54(4). 449–462. 75 indexed citations

11.

Wit, J. de, Ben Dankbaar, & Geert Vissers. (2007). Open Innovation: The New Way of Knowledge Transfer?. 4. 11–19. 33 indexed citations

12.

Collins, Andrew, D. L. Mitchell, Annalisa Zunino, J. de Wit, & David R. Busch. (1997). UV-sensitive rodent mutant cell lines of complementation groups 6 and 8 differ phenotypically from their human counterparts. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 29(2). 152–160. 47 indexed citations

13.

Collins, Andrew, D. L. Mitchell, Annalisa Zunino, J. de Wit, & David R. Busch. (1997). UV‐sensitive rodent mutant cell lines of complementation groups 6 and 8 differ phenotypically from their human counterparts. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 29(2). 152–160. 4 indexed citations

14.

Wit, J. de, et al.. (1996). Environmental impact of animal manure management.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 21 indexed citations

15.

Wit, J. de, et al.. (1996). Environmental impact assessment of landless monogastric livestock production systems. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 4 indexed citations

16.

Wit, J. de, et al.. (1995). Consequences of crossbreeding programme in India.. Economic and political weekly. 7 indexed citations

17.

Schiere, J.B. & J. de Wit. (1995). Feeding urea ammonia treated rice straw in the tropics. II. Assumptions on nutritive value and their validity for least cost ration formulation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 51(1-2). 45–63. 16 indexed citations

18.

Wit, J. de, et al.. (1993). Relevance of breeding and management for more or better straw in different farming systems.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 404–415. 4 indexed citations

19.

Wit, J. de, J.B. Schiere, & H.M.J. Udo. (1993). Analyzing livestock systems in developing countries: experiences of DTAP reviewed.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 146–152. 1 indexed citations

20.

Schiere, J.B., et al.. (1993). Crop - livestock integration, a model approach with special reference to different parameters for sustainability.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 341–346. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact