James E. King

144 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

James E. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Social Psychology 1.3k
  • Developmental Biology 124
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 718
  • Small Animals 352
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 436
Replace Gerhard Lenski with:
Gerhard Lenski United States
Celia Moore United States
Stephanie D. Preston United States
Lee Ellis United States
William R. Leonard United States
Dominic Johnson United Kingdom
Martin Daly Canada
Leonard Green United States
Aurelio José Figueredo United States
Pierre L. van den Berghe United States
James E. King relative to Gerhard Lenski United States Gerhard Lenski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Gerhard Lenski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. King. The network helps show where James E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. King Line = papers co-authored together James E. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 152 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997227
2 2004179
3 2003166
4 1981140
5 2006134
6 2000119
7 2009109
8 200096
9 200490
10 201089
11 200289
12 200287
13 200585
14 200881
15 200780
16 197380
17 200879
18 200378
19 200573
20 201273

About James E. King

James E. King is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Developmental Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 152 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (31 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (18 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (15 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (12 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (10 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (9 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.3k citations), Developmental Biology (124 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (718 citations), Small Animals (352 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (436 citations). James E. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Weiß, Aurelio José Figueredo, Ian O. Williamson, Martha R. Crowther, David P. Lepak, R. M. Enns, Lori Perkins, Thomas R. Van Devender, Tetsuro Matsuzawa and Miho Inoue‐Murayama. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Primatology, Journal of comparative psychology, Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion, Journal of Economic Entomology and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026