Heather Bray
Impact in
- Small Animals top 5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 10
- Ecology 10
- Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact 9
- Co-authors
- Rachel A. Ankeny (18 shared papers)Anna Chur‐Hansen (2 shared papers)Carolyn Semmler (1 shared paper)Beverly S. Mühlhäusler (1 shared paper)Kerry L. Wilkinson (1 shared paper)Sofía C. Zambrano (1 shared paper)W. S. Pitchford (1 shared paper)Stephanie A. Collins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anthrozoös (2 papers)Appetite (2 papers)Animal Production Science (2 papers)International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (1 paper)Communication Research and Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSouth AfricaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Heather Bray
25 papers receiving 533 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Small Animals 131
- Insect Science 134
- Social Psychology 145
- Ecology 170
- Sensory Systems 32
Countries citing papers authored by Heather Bray
This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Bray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Bray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Bray. The network helps show where Heather Bray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 5 |
About Heather Bray
Heather Bray is a scholar working on Small Animals, Ecology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Plant Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (9 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (7 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (131 citations), Insect Science (134 citations), Social Psychology (145 citations), Ecology (170 citations) and Sensory Systems (32 citations). Heather Bray has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rachel A. Ankeny, Anna Chur‐Hansen, Carolyn Semmler, Beverly S. Mühlhäusler, Kerry L. Wilkinson, Sofía C. Zambrano, W. S. Pitchford, Stephanie A. Collins, Michelle Phillipov and James M. Ataria. Their work appears in journals such as Anthrozoös, Appetite, Animal Production Science, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics and Communication Research and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.