Helmut Appel

796 citations
7 papers · 535 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Helmut Appel

6 papers receiving 513 citations

Helmut Appel's Hit Papers

The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression 2015 · 359 citations
3590+3+7Years since publication100200300

Peers

Helmut Appel
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Applied Psychology 130
  • Communication 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 377
  • Literature and Literary Theory 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
Replace Leora Trub with:
Leora Trub United States
Nino Gugushvili Netherlands
Amanda L. Forest United States
Lara N. Wolfers Germany
Ahmad M. Alghraibeh Saudi Arabia
Maxime Résibois Belgium
Julia Kneer Netherlands
Mustafa Savcı Türkiye
Karyn Riddle United States
Holger Schillack Germany
Helmut Appel relative to Leora Trub United States Leora Trub's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Leora Trub · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helmut Appel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helmut Appel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helmut Appel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmut Appel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helmut Appel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helmut Appel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helmut Appel. The network helps show where Helmut Appel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Helmut Appel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helmut Appel Line = papers co-authored together Helmut Appel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression
Hit paper breakdown →
2015359
2 2015167
3 20244
4 20232
5 20212
6 20251
7 20250

About Helmut Appel

Helmut Appel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Applied Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (130 citations), Communication (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (377 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (91 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations). Helmut Appel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Alexander L. Gerlach, Jan Crusius, Maike Luhmann, Juliane Burghardt, Julia Krasko, Samineh Sanatkar and Birte Englich. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Research in Personality, Cognitive Therapy and Research, Current Opinion in Psychology and Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact