Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

740 papers and 26.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 740 papers published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (514 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (418 papers) and Applied Psychology (145 papers) specifically the topics of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (354 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (229 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy are Gerhard Andersson, Ata Ghaderi, Pim Cuijpers, Stefan G. Hofmann, Per Carlbring, Molly L. Choate-Summers, Gordon J. G. Asmundson, JoAnne Dahl, Peter J. Norton and Erik Hedman‐Lagerlöf.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Behaviour Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025