Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors
20081.0k citationsHelen Walker et al.Journal of Purchasing and Supply Managementprofile →
Risk in supply networks
2003608 citationsChristine Harland, Helen Walker et al.Journal of Purchasing and Supply Managementprofile →
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review
2015519 citationsAnne Touboulic, Helen Walkerprofile →
Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
2011490 citationsHelen Walker et al.International Journal of Operations & Production Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Walker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Walker. The network helps show where Helen Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Walker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Walker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Walker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Walker. Helen Walker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lu, Haiyan, et al.. (2015). Informal relationships in supply chains: A systematic review of literature. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University).1 indexed citations
Passant, Neil, et al.. (2006). Greenhouse gas inventories for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: 1990 to 2004. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).45 indexed citations
16.
Harland, Christine, Guy Callender, Louise Knight, et al.. (2006). Public Procurement as a Lever of Government Reform: International Research Evidence. University of Twente Research Information.3 indexed citations
17.
Harland, Christine, et al.. (2003). Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 9(2). 51–62.608 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Knight, Louise, et al.. (2001). Competence requirements for managing supply in interorganizational networks. Journal of Public Procurement. 5(2). 210–234.16 indexed citations
19.
Walker, Helen, et al.. (1992). Risk management for health records--a practical approach.. PubMed. 33(3). 4–6.4 indexed citations
20.
Rodriguez, Daniel J., et al.. (1985). User's guide to the MATHEW/ADPIC models. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 25(4). 698–702.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.