Helen Crisp

712 total citations
10 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

Helen Crisp is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Crisp has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Helen Crisp's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers). Helen Crisp is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers). Helen Crisp collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Spain and United Kingdom. Helen Crisp's co-authors include Katherine E. Moseby, John Read, P. Copley, David C. Paton, Brydie M. Hill, Jenny Stott, Alan Lill, Maldwyn J. Evans, Adrian D. Manning and Katherine Tuft and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Biological Conservation and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Helen Crisp

10 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Helen Crisp Australia	7	456	196	100	91	74	10	509
Unn Klare United Kingdom	7	510 1.1×	145 0.7×	60 0.6×	69 0.8×	73 1.0×	7	544
Adam Dillon United States	5	312 0.7×	147 0.8×	73 0.7×	46 0.5×	108 1.5×	5	405
Bhim Gurung United States	9	477 1.0×	91 0.5×	65 0.7×	76 0.8×	114 1.5×	11	535
Sandra M. C. Cavalcanti Brazil	9	566 1.2×	166 0.8×	82 0.8×	62 0.7×	110 1.5×	13	613
Rebecca West Australia	13	344 0.8×	109 0.6×	123 1.2×	81 0.9×	63 0.9×	30	407
David G. Marneweck South Africa	12	274 0.6×	102 0.5×	46 0.5×	64 0.7×	45 0.6×	19	325
Jan Graf South Africa	8	358 0.8×	201 1.0×	59 0.6×	62 0.7×	34 0.5×	13	420
John Polisar United States	7	504 1.1×	130 0.7×	57 0.6×	74 0.8×	79 1.1×	14	555
Cecily M. Costello United States	12	428 0.9×	107 0.5×	69 0.7×	47 0.5×	62 0.8×	26	470
Kate E. Jenks United States	9	398 0.9×	84 0.4×	74 0.7×	90 1.0×	139 1.9×	13	451

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Crisp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Crisp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Crisp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Crisp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Crisp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Crisp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Crisp. The network helps show where Helen Crisp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Crisp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Crisp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Crisp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Crisp. Helen Crisp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2025). Exclusion of invasive predators triggers succession, competition and habitat diversification in a small mammal community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 292(2050). 20250325–20250325. 1 indexed citations

2.

Crisp, Helen, et al.. (2022). Trapping efficiency of common brushtail possums is affected by rainfall. Australian Mammalogy. 45(2). 246–250. 1 indexed citations

3.

Manning, Adrian D., Maldwyn J. Evans, Sam C. Banks, et al.. (2019). Transition to density dependence in a reintroduced ecosystem engineer. Biodiversity and Conservation. 28(14). 3803–3830. 6 indexed citations

4.

Crisp, Helen, et al.. (2017). The use of hair tubes in detecting irruptive arid-zone rodents. Australian Mammalogy. 40(2). 230–233. 1 indexed citations

5.

Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2012). Interactions between a Top Order Predator and Exotic Mesopredators in the Australian Rangelands. International Journal of Ecology. 2012. 1–15. 100 indexed citations

6.

Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2012). Can predator avoidance training improve reintroduction outcomes for the greater bilby in arid Australia?. Animal Behaviour. 83(4). 1011–1021. 69 indexed citations

7.

Moseby, Katherine E., John Read, David C. Paton, et al.. (2011). Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia. Biological Conservation. 144(12). 2863–2872. 209 indexed citations

8.

Crisp, Helen & Katherine E. Moseby. (2010). One‐way gates: Initial trial of a potential tool for preventing overpopulation within fenced reserves. Ecological Management & Restoration. 11(2). 139–141. 7 indexed citations

9.

Moseby, Katherine E., Jenny Stott, & Helen Crisp. (2009). Movement patterns of feral predators in an arid environment – implications for control through poison baiting. Wildlife Research. 36(5). 422–435. 95 indexed citations

10.

Lill, Alan & Helen Crisp. (2006). City slickers: Habitat use and foraging in urban Common Mynas Acridotheres tristis. 30(1). 9–15. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact