Katherine Tuft

1.4k total citations
27 papers, 644 citations indexed

About

Katherine Tuft is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine Tuft has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 644 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Ecology, 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Katherine Tuft's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (22 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (9 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). Katherine Tuft is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (22 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (9 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). Katherine Tuft collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Katherine Tuft's co-authors include Sarah Legge, Christopher N. Johnson, Hugh McGregor, Rosemary Hohnen, Ian J. Radford, Menna E. Jones, Leon A. Barmuta, Lily Leahy, John C. Z. Woinarski and Alex James and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Katherine Tuft

25 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine Tuft Australia 14 583 189 185 169 151 27 644
Bobby Tamayo Australia 7 617 1.1× 198 1.0× 214 1.2× 108 0.6× 244 1.6× 8 720
Brooke Rankmore Australia 8 386 0.7× 153 0.8× 117 0.6× 101 0.6× 137 0.9× 12 469
K. Brennan Australia 6 352 0.6× 105 0.6× 122 0.7× 97 0.6× 106 0.7× 7 416
Chris J. Jolly Australia 13 461 0.8× 310 1.6× 176 1.0× 106 0.6× 147 1.0× 44 673
Giulia Santulli Spain 7 303 0.5× 77 0.4× 196 1.1× 59 0.3× 130 0.9× 8 401
Rajanathan Rajaratnam Australia 12 405 0.7× 63 0.3× 157 0.8× 83 0.5× 68 0.5× 29 457
Giordano Ciocheti Brazil 9 462 0.8× 53 0.3× 134 0.7× 68 0.4× 159 1.1× 12 519
María Luisa S. P. Jorge United States 11 375 0.6× 77 0.4× 95 0.5× 72 0.4× 162 1.1× 23 482
Elham Nourani Germany 14 416 0.7× 83 0.4× 223 1.2× 86 0.5× 85 0.6× 30 537
R. J. Burt Australia 11 551 0.9× 168 0.9× 142 0.8× 102 0.6× 246 1.6× 12 637

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Tuft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Tuft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Tuft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Tuft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Tuft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Tuft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Tuft. The network helps show where Katherine Tuft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Tuft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Tuft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Tuft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Tuft. Katherine Tuft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2025). Exclusion of invasive predators triggers succession, competition and habitat diversification in a small mammal community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 292(2050). 20250325–20250325. 1 indexed citations
2.
Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2024). A new device to reduce mammal predation on reptiles in pitfall traps. Wildlife Research. 51(8).
3.
4.
Nistelberger, Heidi, Emily Roycroft, Anna J. MacDonald, et al.. (2023). Genetic mixing in conservation translocations increases diversity of a keystone threatened species, Bettongia lesueur. Molecular Ecology. 34(17). e17119–e17119. 9 indexed citations
5.
Tuft, Katherine, et al.. (2023). From threatened to threatening: Impacts of a reintroduced predator on reintroduced prey. Animal Conservation. 28(1). 5–18. 7 indexed citations
6.
Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2023). Influence of interactive effects on long‐term population trajectories in multispecies reintroductions. Conservation Biology. 38(3). e14209–e14209. 5 indexed citations
7.
Mosley, Luke M., et al.. (2022). Assessing soil corrosivity along feral-proof fencing in the Australian Arid Zone and the development of a new soil corrosivity index. Geoderma Regional. 29. e00501–e00501. 2 indexed citations
9.
Tuft, Katherine, Sarah Legge, Anke S. K. Frank, et al.. (2021). Cats are a key threatening factor to the survival of local populations of native small mammals in Australia’s tropical savannas: evidence from translocation trials with Rattus tunneyi. Wildlife Research. 48(7). 654–662. 13 indexed citations
10.
Sato, Chloe F., Martin J. Westgate, Philip S. Barton, et al.. (2019). The use and utility of surrogates in biodiversity monitoring programmes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 56(6). 1304–1310. 15 indexed citations
11.
Hohnen, Rosemary, Katherine Tuft, Hugh McGregor, et al.. (2016). Occupancy of the Invasive Feral Cat Varies with Habitat Complexity. PLoS ONE. 11(9). e0152520–e0152520. 49 indexed citations
12.
Hohnen, Rosemary, Katherine Tuft, Sarah Legge, et al.. (2016). Rainfall and topography predict gene flow among populations of the declining northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus). Conservation Genetics. 17(5). 1213–1228. 23 indexed citations
13.
Leahy, Lily, Sarah Legge, Katherine Tuft, et al.. (2016). Amplified predation after fire suppresses rodent populations in Australia’s tropical savannas. Wildlife Research. 42(8). 705–716. 165 indexed citations
14.
Legge, Sarah, et al.. (2016). Optimising camera trap deployment design across multiple sites for species inventory surveys. Pacific Conservation Biology. 23(1). 43–51. 10 indexed citations
15.
Hohnen, Rosemary, Katherine Tuft, Sarah Legge, et al.. (2016). The significance of topographic complexity in habitat selection and persistence of a declining marsupial in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology. 64(3). 198–216. 15 indexed citations
16.
Tuft, Katherine, et al.. (2016). Bait preference for remote camera trap studies of the endangered northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus). Australian Mammalogy. 39(1). 72–77. 20 indexed citations
17.
Hohnen, Rosemary, Katherine Tuft, Sarah Legge, et al.. (2015). Post-fire habitat use of the golden-backed tree-rat (Mesembriomys macrurus) in the northwest Kimberley, Western Australia. Austral Ecology. 40(8). 941–952. 20 indexed citations
18.
Legge, Sarah, et al.. (2015). Can we mitigate cane toad impacts on northern quolls? - Final report. 7 indexed citations
19.
Frank, Anke S. K., Christopher N. Johnson, Joanne Potts, et al.. (2014). Experimental evidence that feral cats cause local extirpation of small mammals in Australia's tropical savannas. Journal of Applied Ecology. 51(6). 1486–1493. 85 indexed citations
20.
Tuft, Katherine, et al.. (2011). Predation risk and competitive interactions affect foraging of an endangered refuge‐dependent herbivore. Animal Conservation. 14(4). 447–457. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026