Brydie M. Hill

1.8k total citations
26 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Brydie M. Hill is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Brydie M. Hill has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Genetics and 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Brydie M. Hill's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (26 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (12 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers). Brydie M. Hill is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (26 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (12 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers). Brydie M. Hill collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Philippines. Brydie M. Hill's co-authors include Katherine E. Moseby, John Read, David C. Paton, P. Copley, Helen Crisp, John C. Z. Woinarski, David J. Eldridge, Alex I. James, Stuart Young and A. Fisher and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Conservation Biology and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Brydie M. Hill

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brydie M. Hill Australia 15 944 328 278 224 203 26 1.1k
Hugh McGregor Australia 17 1.1k 1.1× 445 1.4× 243 0.9× 233 1.0× 286 1.4× 36 1.2k
N.L. McKenzie Australia 9 727 0.8× 215 0.7× 179 0.6× 267 1.2× 187 0.9× 10 876
Aaron M. Haines United States 18 801 0.8× 195 0.6× 235 0.8× 204 0.9× 154 0.8× 40 961
Alaric Fisher Australia 16 1.0k 1.1× 303 0.9× 376 1.4× 375 1.7× 308 1.5× 32 1.3k
Richard Southgate Australia 17 785 0.8× 171 0.5× 299 1.1× 204 0.9× 190 0.9× 26 971
Alexandros A. Karamanlidis Norway 20 1.0k 1.1× 293 0.9× 216 0.8× 94 0.4× 385 1.9× 65 1.3k
Malcolm S. Kennedy Australia 12 636 0.7× 199 0.6× 238 0.9× 95 0.4× 146 0.7× 36 837
Sarah R. B. King United States 16 810 0.9× 184 0.6× 226 0.8× 275 1.2× 159 0.8× 44 1.0k
Ian J. Radford Australia 19 930 1.0× 240 0.7× 479 1.7× 251 1.1× 542 2.7× 46 1.3k
A. A. Burbidge Australia 11 768 0.8× 190 0.6× 310 1.1× 248 1.1× 222 1.1× 17 980

Countries citing papers authored by Brydie M. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brydie M. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brydie M. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brydie M. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brydie M. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brydie M. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brydie M. Hill. The network helps show where Brydie M. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brydie M. Hill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brydie M. Hill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brydie M. Hill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brydie M. Hill. Brydie M. Hill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Radford, Ian J., et al.. (2024). Nestbox use indicates declining arboreal mammals in an Australian savanna may be limited by tree hollow availability. Forest Ecology and Management. 561. 121915–121915. 1 indexed citations
2.
Byrne, Margaret, Steven J. Cooper, Judy Dunlop, et al.. (2023). Population genomic diversity and structure in the golden bandicoot: a history of isolation, extirpation, and conservation. Heredity. 131(5-6). 374–386. 6 indexed citations
3.
5.
Stokeld, Danielle, et al.. (2021). No mammal recovery from feral cat experimental exclusion trials in Kakadu National Park. Wildlife Research. 49(4). 335–346. 2 indexed citations
6.
Stobo‐Wilson, Alyson M., Danielle Stokeld, Luke D. Einoder, et al.. (2020). Habitat structural complexity explains patterns of feral cat and dingo occurrence in monsoonal Australia. Diversity and Distributions. 26(7). 832–842. 50 indexed citations
7.
McGregor, Hugh, John Read, Christopher N. Johnson, et al.. (2020). Edge effects created by fenced conservation reserves benefit an invasive mesopredator. Wildlife Research. 47(8). 677–685. 6 indexed citations
8.
Stobo‐Wilson, Alyson M., Danielle Stokeld, Luke D. Einoder, et al.. (2020). Bottom-up and top-down processes influence contemporary patterns of mammal species richness in Australia's monsoonal tropics. Biological Conservation. 247. 108638–108638. 31 indexed citations
9.
Moseby, Katherine E., Hugh McGregor, Brydie M. Hill, & John Read. (2019). Exploring the internal and external wildlife gradients created by conservation fences. Conservation Biology. 34(1). 220–231. 17 indexed citations
10.
Stokeld, Danielle, Alaric Fisher, Brydie M. Hill, et al.. (2018). What do predator diets tell us about mammal declines in Kakadu National Park?. Wildlife Research. 45(1). 92–101. 21 indexed citations
11.
Gillespie, Graeme R., et al.. (2015). A guide for the use of remote cameras for wildlife survey in northern Australia. 13 indexed citations
12.
Moseby, Katherine E., Brydie M. Hill, & Tyrone H. Lavery. (2014). Tailoring Release Protocols to Individual Species and Sites: One Size Does Not Fit All. PLoS ONE. 9(6). e99753–e99753. 59 indexed citations
13.
Woinarski, John C. Z., A. Fisher, M. Armstrong, et al.. (2012). Monitoring indicates greater resilience for birds than for mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Wildlife Research. 39(5). 397–407. 19 indexed citations
14.
Moseby, Katherine E. & Brydie M. Hill. (2011). The use of poison baits to control feral cats and red foxes in arid South Australia I. Aerial baiting trials. Wildlife Research. 38(4). 338–349. 54 indexed citations
15.
Moseby, Katherine E., John Read, David C. Paton, et al.. (2011). Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia. Biological Conservation. 144(12). 2863–2872. 209 indexed citations
16.
Moseby, Katherine E., et al.. (2011). The use of poison baits to control feral cats and red foxes in arid South Australia II. Bait type, placement, lures and non-target uptake. Wildlife Research. 38(4). 350–358. 40 indexed citations
17.
Woinarski, John C. Z., M. Armstrong, K. Brennan, et al.. (2010). Monitoring indicates rapid and severe decline of native small mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Wildlife Research. 37(2). 116–126. 206 indexed citations
18.
Woinarski, John C. Z., Brooke Rankmore, Brydie M. Hill, et al.. (2009). Fauna assemblages in regrowth vegetation in tropical open forests of the Northern Territory, Australia. Wildlife Research. 36(8). 675–690. 12 indexed citations
19.
James, Alex I., David J. Eldridge, & Brydie M. Hill. (2009). Foraging animals create fertile patches in an Australian desert shrubland. Ecography. 32(5). 723–732. 79 indexed citations
20.
Moseby, Katherine E., Brydie M. Hill, & John Read. (2009). Arid Recovery – A comparison of reptile and small mammal populations inside and outside a large rabbit, cat and fox‐proof exclosure in arid South Australia. Austral Ecology. 34(2). 156–169. 116 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026