John Polisar
Impact in
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Papers in ⓘ
- Ecology 11
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 10
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 3
-
- Turtle Biology and Conservation 2
- Co-authors
- Daniel G. Scognamillo (3 shared papers)Mel Sunquist (1 shared paper)Melvin E. Sunquist (2 shared papers)John F. Eisenberg (2 shared papers)Rony Garcia‐Anleu (3 shared papers)Robert H. Horwich (1 shared paper)Mathias W. Tobler (1 shared paper)Alfonso Zúñiga Hartley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (2 papers)AMBIO (1 paper)Animals (1 paper)Chelonian Conservation and Biology (1 paper)Journal of Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHondurasMexico
In The Last Decade
John Polisar
12 papers receiving 524 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Small Animals 151
- Ecology 504
- Ecological Modeling 79
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 74
- Social Psychology 101
Countries citing papers authored by John Polisar
This map shows the geographic impact of John Polisar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Polisar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Polisar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Polisar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Polisar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Polisar. The network helps show where John Polisar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Polisar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 242 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 208 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 9 | Jaguar hunting and trafficking in Mesoamerica: Recent observations | 2018 | 4 |
| 10 | Jaguares y productores agropecuarios en la Zona de Amortiguamiento de la Reserva de la Biosfera Maya, Guatemala: herramientas para mejorar la coexistencia | 2017 | 3 |
| 11 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 0 |
About John Polisar
John Polisar is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology, Ecological Modeling and Paleontology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers) and Turtle Biology and Conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (151 citations), Ecology (504 citations), Ecological Modeling (79 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (74 citations) and Social Psychology (101 citations). John Polisar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Honduras and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Daniel G. Scognamillo, Mel Sunquist, Melvin E. Sunquist, John F. Eisenberg, Rony Garcia‐Anleu, Robert H. Horwich, Mathias W. Tobler, Alfonso Zúñiga Hartley, Samia E. Carrillo‐Percastegui and Cristián Bonacic. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, AMBIO, Animals, Chelonian Conservation and Biology and Journal of Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.