Héctor Chade
-
- Auction Theory and Applications 15
- Game Theory and Applications 5
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Economic theories and models 17
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 8
- Economic Policies and Impacts 6
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 5
- Marketing top 5%
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing 5
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 5
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
Héctor Chade
37 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Management Science and Operations Research 260
- Economics and Econometrics 366
- Marketing 114
- Safety Research 100
- General Decision Sciences 21
Countries citing papers authored by Héctor Chade
This map shows the geographic impact of Héctor Chade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Héctor Chade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Héctor Chade more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Héctor Chade
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Héctor Chade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Héctor Chade. The network helps show where Héctor Chade may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Héctor Chade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 88 | |
| 7 | The No-Upward-Crossing Condition and the Moral Hazard Problem | 2016 | 2 |
| 8 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 20 | Essays on Two-Sided Search With Heterogeneous Agents | 1997 | 2 |
About Héctor Chade
Héctor Chade is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Marketing, having authored 37 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (17 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (15 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (8 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (6 papers), Game Theory and Applications (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (260 citations), Economics and Econometrics (366 citations), Marketing (114 citations), Safety Research (100 citations) and General Decision Sciences (21 citations). Héctor Chade has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lones Smith, Edward E. Schlee, Jan Eeckhout, Gordon Κ. Lewis, Gustavo Ventura, Jeroen M. Swinkels, Bart Taub, Gregory Lewis and Greg Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Theory, Economic Theory, Theoretical Economics, The Review of Economic Studies and Mathematical Social Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.