Stefan Napel

1.2k citations
54 papers · 596 indexed · h-index 15

Stefan Napel

50 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

Stefan Napel
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Economics and Econometrics 390
  • Safety Research 112
  • Management Science and Operations Research 161
  • General Decision Sciences 23
  • Political Science and International Relations 164
Replace Alexander Wolitzky with:
Alexander Wolitzky United States
Mehmet Baç Türkiye
John R. Chamberlin United States
Aanund Hylland United States
Chris William Sanchirico United States
François Maniquet Belgium
Emerson M. S. Niou United States
Elisha A. Pazner Israel
Peter J. Coughlin United States
Stefan Napel relative to Alexander Wolitzky United States Alexander Wolitzky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Alexander Wolitzky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Napel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Napel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Napel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Napel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan Napel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Napel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Napel. The network helps show where Stefan Napel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stefan Napel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stefan Napel Line = papers co-authored together Stefan Napel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20210
2 20206
3 20197
4 20191
5 20172
6 20161
7 201410
8 201318
9 201111
10 201018
11 201046
12
Strategic power in the eu council in consultation and codecision procedures
20080
13 200712
14 20079
15 20059
16 20046
17
EU Conciliation Committee: Council 56 versus Parliament 6
20034
18
A Pragmatic Interpretation of Ken Binmore’s Theory of Justice
20039
19 20028
20 200222

About Stefan Napel

Stefan Napel is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics and General Decision Sciences, having authored 54 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (27 papers), Game Theory and Applications (12 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (11 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (7 papers), Economic theories and models (7 papers) and Economic Policies and Impacts (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (390 citations), Safety Research (112 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (161 citations). Stefan Napel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mika Widgrén, Dilip Mookherjee, Sascha Kurz, Debraj Ray, Werner Güth, Manfred J. Holler, Siegfried K. Berninghaus, Andrea Schneider, J. M. Alonso-Meijide and Matthias Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Economy, European Journal of Operational Research and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026