Heather J. Young

7 papers receiving 375 citations

Heather J. Young's Hit Papers

Dietary assessment in UK Biobank: an evaluation of the performance of the touchscreen dietary questionnaire 2018 · 240 citations
2400+2+5Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Heather J. Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 86
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 29
  • Physiology 43
  • Rehabilitation 10
  • Plant Science 52
Replace Pratip Chakraborty with:
Pratip Chakraborty India
T Hirakawa Japan
Weiping Li China
Laura E. McBreairty Canada
Wardah Abdullah Alasmari Saudi Arabia
S. Venkatesh India
Jingyu Ren China
Giuseppina Matera Italy
Nir Erdinest Israel
Barbara Aquilanti Italy
Heather J. Young relative to Pratip Chakraborty India Pratip Chakraborty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Pratip Chakraborty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heather J. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather J. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather J. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather J. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather J. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather J. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather J. Young. The network helps show where Heather J. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather J. Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heather J. Young Line = papers co-authored together Heather J. Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Dietary assessment in UK Biobank: an evaluation of the performance of the touchscreen dietary questionnaire
Hit paper breakdown →
2018240
2 198668
3 200536
4 202222
5 202011
6 20225
7 20201

About Heather J. Young

Heather J. Young is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Fatty Acid Research and Health (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (86 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (29 citations), Physiology (43 citations), Rehabilitation (10 citations) and Plant Science (52 citations). Heather J. Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Key, Wenji Guo, Kathryn E. Bradbury, Thomas W. Fermanian, R. M. Skirvin, Andrew Brittingham, Erik Procko, Diwakar Shukla, Balaji Selvam and Matthew C. Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Nutritional Science, Nutrients and Plant Cell Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact