Heather J. Carmack

670 total citations
62 papers, 437 citations indexed

About

Heather J. Carmack is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather J. Carmack has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 437 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Social Psychology, 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Heather J. Carmack's work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (13 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers). Heather J. Carmack is often cited by papers focused on Communication in Education and Healthcare (13 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers). Heather J. Carmack collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Heather J. Carmack's co-authors include Jocelyn M. DeGroot, Carey M. Noland, Leah E. LeFebvre, Benjamin R. Bates, Lynn M. Harter, Amy E. Chadwick, B. Scott Titsworth, Margaret M. Quinlan, Rukhsana Ahmed and Jennifer Bennet and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Clinical Pathology and Qualitative Health Research.

In The Last Decade

Heather J. Carmack

52 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather J. Carmack United States 13 133 133 102 92 54 62 437
Linda Harris United States 10 94 0.7× 114 0.9× 89 0.9× 126 1.4× 41 0.8× 18 430
Deborah L. Plummer United States 8 73 0.5× 171 1.3× 87 0.9× 73 0.8× 63 1.2× 15 355
Samantha Nazione United States 16 110 0.8× 253 1.9× 101 1.0× 163 1.8× 44 0.8× 33 635
Peijia Zha United States 11 222 1.7× 119 0.9× 113 1.1× 128 1.4× 89 1.6× 35 616
Thomas Harding New Zealand 13 71 0.5× 154 1.2× 59 0.6× 158 1.7× 69 1.3× 37 521
Ashley P. Duggan United States 12 110 0.8× 122 0.9× 62 0.6× 155 1.7× 63 1.2× 31 477
Bernadette Sebar Australia 18 107 0.8× 263 2.0× 138 1.4× 133 1.4× 36 0.7× 39 617
Lourdes M. Rivera United States 11 111 0.8× 157 1.2× 102 1.0× 55 0.6× 231 4.3× 20 493
Edwin E. Gantt United States 10 120 0.9× 122 0.9× 137 1.3× 99 1.1× 56 1.0× 40 481
Tahira Jibeen Pakistan 13 137 1.0× 130 1.0× 173 1.7× 78 0.8× 76 1.4× 22 436

Countries citing papers authored by Heather J. Carmack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather J. Carmack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather J. Carmack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather J. Carmack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather J. Carmack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather J. Carmack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather J. Carmack. The network helps show where Heather J. Carmack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather J. Carmack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather J. Carmack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather J. Carmack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather J. Carmack. Heather J. Carmack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Britt, Rebecca K., et al.. (2025). Thematic and Scholarly Trajectories in the Journal Health Communication. Health Communication. 41(2). 246–254.
3.
Wilkerson, Amanda H., et al.. (2024). Disease Management Experiences among College Students with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Health Education. 1–13.
4.
Carmack, Heather J., et al.. (2024). Lost, mislabeled, and mishandled surgical and clinical pathology specimens: A systematic review of published literature. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 162(4). 349–355.
5.
Britt, Rebecca K., et al.. (2023). Does Organizational Messaging Make a Difference? Investigating Themes and Language Style in Twitter Discourse and Engagement by Mental Health Organizations. Journal of Health Communication. 29(1). 1–8. 2 indexed citations
7.
Carmack, Heather J., et al.. (2023). “Crypt Keeper That She Is”: Mariah Bell and the Media Framing of Age in the 2022 U.S. National Figure Skating Championships. Communication & Sport. 12(5). 754–771. 3 indexed citations
8.
Carmack, Heather J. & Jocelyn M. DeGroot. (2023). Franchising the Disenfranchised: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Support Messages in American Miscarriage Sympathy Cards. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 29(4). 404–420. 1 indexed citations
10.
LeFebvre, Leah E., et al.. (2022). Preparing the Next Generation of Teachers Inappropriately: When Introductory Course Directors Engage in Misbehaviors. Communication Studies. 73(4). 476–496.
11.
Carmack, Heather J., et al.. (2020). Contradictions and Predicaments in Instructors’ Boundary Negotiations of Students’ Health Disclosures. Health Communication. 36(7). 795–803. 3 indexed citations
12.
LeFebvre, Leah E., et al.. (2019). “It’s only one negative comment”: women instructors’ perceptions of (un)helpful support messages following hurtful course evaluations. Communication Education. 69(1). 19–47. 10 indexed citations
13.
Carmack, Heather J.. (2019). Hospital Image Repair Strategies, Organizational Apology, and Medical Errors: An Analysis of the CoxHealth Brain Over-Radiation Case. Health Communication. 35(12). 1466–1474. 4 indexed citations
14.
Carmack, Heather J., et al.. (2018). College students’ communication about complementary and alternative medicine practices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 7161–7161.
15.
Noland, Carey M. & Heather J. Carmack. (2014). “You Never Forget Your First Mistake”: Nursing Socialization, Memorable Messages, and Communication About Medical Errors. Health Communication. 30(12). 1234–1244. 27 indexed citations
16.
Carmack, Heather J., et al.. (2013). Stress, Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Intent to Leave Among Collegiate Forensic Educators. Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato). 31(1). 4 indexed citations
17.
DeGroot, Jocelyn M. & Heather J. Carmack. (2013). “It May Not Be Pretty, But It's Honest”: Examining Parental Grief on the Callapitter Blog. Death Studies. 37(5). 448–470. 18 indexed citations
18.
Carmack, Heather J.. (2010). Practice Under Pressure: Primary Care Physicians and Their Medicine in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 21(4). 1412–1414. 7 indexed citations
19.
Carmack, Heather J., et al.. (2010). Forensics as a Correlate of Graduate School Success. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research. 3 indexed citations
20.
Carmack, Heather J., Benjamin R. Bates, & Lynn M. Harter. (2008). Narrative Constructions of Health Care Issues and Policies: The Case of President Clinton’s Apology-by-Proxy for the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. Journal of Medical Humanities. 29(2). 89–109. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026