Edwin E. Gantt

36 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Edwin E. Gantt
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • General Psychology 50
  • Philosophy 81
  • Clinical Psychology 135
  • Social Psychology 120
  • Health 38
Replace Matthew R. Merrens with:
Matthew R. Merrens United States
Mary Kopala United States
Nollaig Frost United Kingdom
Victoria A. Shivy United States
Pnina Shinebourne United Kingdom
Emalinda L. McSpadden United States
David V. Perkins United States
Louis V. Paradise United States
Baron Perlman United States
Charlotte Schwartz United States
Edwin E. Gantt relative to Matthew R. Merrens United States Matthew R. Merrens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Matthew R. Merrens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin E. Gantt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin E. Gantt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin E. Gantt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin E. Gantt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin E. Gantt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin E. Gantt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin E. Gantt. The network helps show where Edwin E. Gantt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Edwin E. Gantt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin E. Gantt Line = papers co-authored together Edwin E. Gantt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008149
2 199954
3
Psychology for the Other: Levinas, Ethics and the Practice of Psychology
200245
4 200544
5 199822
6 201922
7 200020
8 199916
9 201215
10 19989
11 20129
12 20138
13 20217
14 20137
15 19966
16
Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Psychological Issues
20175
17 20124
18 20124
19
Psychology for the Other
20024
20 19944

About Edwin E. Gantt

Edwin E. Gantt is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (14 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers), Social Representations and Identity (6 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (50 citations), Philosophy (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (135 citations), Social Psychology (120 citations) and Health (38 citations). Edwin E. Gantt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dave S. Collingridge, Richard N. Williams, Brent D. Slife, Stephen C. Yanchar, Jeffrey S. Reber, Lane Fischer, Jeffrey R. Lacasse, James E. Faulconer and Bruce L. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, Theory & Psychology, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Journal of Humanistic Psychology and American Journal of Medical Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact