This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Smith. The network helps show where Hazel Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hazel Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hazel Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hazel Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hazel Smith. Hazel Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Hazel. (2016). Nutrition and Health in North Korea: What’s New, What’s Changed and Why It Matters. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 12(1). 7.4 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Hazel. (2015). North Korea. Cambridge University Press eBooks.28 indexed citations
Smith, Hazel. (2000). Democracy and international relations : critical theories/problematic practices. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire).14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.