Critical Asian Studies

687 papers and 6.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 687 papers published in Critical Asian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Asian Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (502 papers), Political Science and International Relations (307 papers) and Cultural Studies (75 papers) specifically the topics of Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (136 papers), Asian Studies and History (111 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Asian Studies are Edward Aspinall, Merlyna Lim, Francis Lee, Ben Kiernan, Sarah Milne, Jennifer Robertson, Duncan McCargo, Philip F. Kelly, Ian G. Baird and Nicole Constable.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Asian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Asian Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Asian Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025