Harvey Lederman

18 papers receiving 142 citations

Peers

Harvey Lederman
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Philosophy 65
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
  • History and Philosophy of Science 19
  • Language and Linguistics 12
Replace Simon Goldstein with:
Simon Goldstein Hong Kong
Dominic Hyde Australia
Nathan Klinedinst United Kingdom
Daniel Cohnitz Estonia
Brad Armendt United States
Augustus De Morgan United Kingdom
Denis Bonnay France
Marian David United States
Gyula Klima United States
Arif Ahmed United Kingdom
Harvey Lederman relative to Simon Goldstein Hong Kong Simon Goldstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Simon Goldstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harvey Lederman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harvey Lederman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harvey Lederman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvey Lederman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harvey Lederman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harvey Lederman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harvey Lederman. The network helps show where Harvey Lederman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Harvey Lederman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harvey Lederman Line = papers co-authored together Harvey Lederman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200629
2 201517
3 201715
4 201613
5 201912
6 202012
7 201912
8 20178
9 20167
10 20215
11 20195
12 20164
13 20223
14 20213
15 20242
16
Standard State Space Models of Unawareness
20151
17 20221
18 20161
19 20220
20 20250

About Harvey Lederman

Harvey Lederman is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 150 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (65 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations) and Language and Linguistics (12 citations). Harvey Lederman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Goodman, H. R. G. Greaves, Hartry Field, P. Fritz, Gabriel Uzquiano, Christian Tarsney, Kyle Mahowald and Dean Spears. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Review, Noûs and Linguistics and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact