Harry L. Chiesi
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- James F. VossGeorge J. SpilichGregg VesonderRichard R. RosinskiJames W. PellegrinoAlexander W. SiegelAnthony Debons
- Topics
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers)Color perception and design (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyFamily Practice
- Journals
- Memory & CognitionJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Harry L. Chiesi
6 papers receiving 744 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 574
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 334
- Cognitive Neuroscience 232
- Education 201
- Artificial Intelligence 152
Countries citing papers authored by Harry L. Chiesi
This map shows the geographic impact of Harry L. Chiesi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harry L. Chiesi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harry L. Chiesi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harry L. Chiesi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harry L. Chiesi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harry L. Chiesi. The network helps show where Harry L. Chiesi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harry L. Chiesi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harry L. Chiesi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harry L. Chiesi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harry L. Chiesi. Harry L. Chiesi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 402 | |
| 3 | 441 | |
| 4 | 82 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 |
About Harry L. Chiesi
Harry L. Chiesi is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 6 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (574 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (334 citations) and Family Practice (27 citations). Harry L. Chiesi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James F. Voss, George J. Spilich, Gregg Vesonder, Richard R. Rosinski, James W. Pellegrino, Alexander W. Siegel and Anthony Debons. Their work appears in journals such as Memory & Cognition, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.