Harold W. Hake
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- W. R. GarnerCharles W. EriksenDavid A. GrantRay HymanDaniel J. WeintraubArthur J. RiopelleJohn S. McIntyreHarry G. Murray
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers)University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers)Color perception and design (3 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological ReviewThe American Journal of PsychologyJournal of the Optical Society of America
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Harold W. Hake
20 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Cognitive Neuroscience 491
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 340
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 244
- Social Psychology 226
- Artificial Intelligence 178
Countries citing papers authored by Harold W. Hake
This map shows the geographic impact of Harold W. Hake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold W. Hake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold W. Hake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harold W. Hake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold W. Hake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold W. Hake. The network helps show where Harold W. Hake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harold W. Hake
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harold W. Hake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harold W. Hake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harold W. Hake. Harold W. Hake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Operationism and the concept of perception.breakdown → | 502 |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 57 | |
| 15 | 114 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 165 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Harold W. Hake
Harold W. Hake is a scholar working on General Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Sensory Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers) and Color perception and design (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (87 citations), General Psychology (50 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (340 citations). Harold W. Hake has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. R. Garner, Charles W. Eriksen, David A. Grant, Ray Hyman, Daniel J. Weintraub, Arthur J. Riopelle, John S. McIntyre, Harry G. Murray, Stanley B. Woll and Emanuel Averbach. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, The American Journal of Psychology and Journal of the Optical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.