W. R. Garner

12.0k citations
89 papers · 8.2k indexed · 5 hit papers · h-index 36
Topics
Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers)Color perception and design (14 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers)

In The Last Decade

W. R. Garner

86 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Processing of Information and Structure19562026197920021974196419591970195650010001.5k

Peers

W. R. Garner
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 4.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.9k
  • Social Psychology 1.7k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 954
Replace D. Ε. Broadbent with:
D. Ε. Broadbent United Kingdom
Eugene Galanter United States
George Mandler United States
Donald E. Broadbent United Kingdom
W. K. Estes United States
William G. Chase United States
Eleanor J. Gibson United States
Earl Hunt United States
Geoffrey R. Loftus United States
Karl H. Pribram United States
W. R. Garner relative to D. Ε. Broadbent United Kingdom D. Ε. Broadbent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
D. Ε. Broadbent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. R. Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. R. Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. R. Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. R. Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. R. Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. R. Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. R. Garner. The network helps show where W. R. Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. R. Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. R. Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. R. Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. R. Garner. W. R. Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 5
3 8
4 16
5 24
6 1
7 51
8 6
9
Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processingbreakdown →
519
10 20
11 95
12 77
13 18
14 202
15 8
16 6
17 12
18 91
19 1
20 15

About W. R. Garner

W. R. Garner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 89 papers that have together received 8.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Color perception and design (14 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (4.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.9k citations) and General Decision Sciences (289 citations). W. R. Garner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Fred L. Royer, D. Ε. Broadbent, Harold W. Hake, Charles W. Eriksen, David E. Clement, W. J. McGill, James R. Pomerantz, John Morton, Peter Podgorny and Alexandra K. Wigdor. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Psychological Bulletin and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026