W. R. Garner

12.0k total citations · 5 hit papers
89 papers, 8.2k citations indexed

About

W. R. Garner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, W. R. Garner has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 8.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in W. R. Garner's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Color perception and design (14 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). W. R. Garner is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Color perception and design (14 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). W. R. Garner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. W. R. Garner's co-authors include Fred L. Royer, D. Ε. Broadbent, Harold W. Hake, Charles W. Eriksen, David E. Clement, W. J. McGill, James R. Pomerantz, John Morton, Peter Podgorny and Alexandra K. Wigdor and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Psychological Bulletin and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

W. R. Garner

86 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Processing of Information and Structure 1956 2026 1979 2002 1974 1964 1959 1970 1956 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. R. Garner United States 36 4.4k 2.9k 1.7k 1.4k 954 89 8.2k
Eugene Galanter United States 25 3.0k 0.7× 2.0k 0.7× 1.7k 1.0× 1.7k 1.2× 1.2k 1.3× 54 9.0k
C. Douglas Creelman United States 18 6.4k 1.4× 2.3k 0.8× 1.4k 0.8× 1.0k 0.7× 629 0.7× 40 9.0k
D. Ε. Broadbent United Kingdom 33 5.0k 1.1× 3.3k 1.2× 1.5k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 895 0.9× 83 10.2k
Neil A. Macmillan United States 28 6.5k 1.5× 2.4k 0.8× 1.7k 1.1× 1.2k 0.8× 800 0.8× 48 9.1k
James T. Townsend United States 48 5.9k 1.3× 2.7k 1.0× 1.4k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 1.5k 1.6× 166 10.3k
Eleanor J. Gibson United States 45 4.8k 1.1× 2.4k 0.8× 2.2k 1.3× 4.4k 3.1× 682 0.7× 89 11.0k
Geoffrey R. Loftus United States 40 6.0k 1.4× 2.1k 0.7× 1.6k 1.0× 1.7k 1.2× 753 0.8× 118 8.8k
Jo Ingleby United Kingdom 7 4.1k 0.9× 1.2k 0.4× 1.0k 0.6× 576 0.4× 535 0.6× 15 7.1k
D. E. Berlyne Canada 36 3.8k 0.9× 4.8k 1.7× 3.7k 2.2× 1.9k 1.3× 412 0.4× 96 11.6k
Charles W. Eriksen United States 51 14.9k 3.4× 5.1k 1.8× 3.1k 1.9× 2.6k 1.8× 478 0.5× 148 19.0k

Countries citing papers authored by W. R. Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. R. Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. R. Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. R. Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. R. Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. R. Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. R. Garner. The network helps show where W. R. Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. R. Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. R. Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. R. Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. R. Garner. W. R. Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Garner, W. R.. (1999). Reductionism Reduced. Contemporary Psychology. 44(1). 20–21. 2 indexed citations
2.
Kramer, Arthur F., Michael Coles, Barbara A. Eriksen, et al.. (1994). Charles Eriksen Past, present, and future. Perception & Psychophysics. 55(1). 1–8. 5 indexed citations
3.
Natriello, Gary, Alexandra K. Wigdor, & W. R. Garner. (1983). Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences, and Controversies. Part 1: Report of the Committee.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 12(2). 176–176. 8 indexed citations
4.
Garner, W. R. & Forrest Haun. (1978). Letter identification as a function of type of perceptual limitation and type of attribute.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 4(2). 199–209. 16 indexed citations
5.
Garner, W. R.. (1977). The effect of absolute size on the separability of the dimensions of size and brightness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 9(5). 380–382. 24 indexed citations
6.
Garner, W. R.. (1976). Adequate and inadequate stimulus information: Comments on "Some Considerations of Two Alleged Kinds of Selective Attention" by Keren.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 105(4). 375–377. 1 indexed citations
7.
Garner, W. R., et al.. (1974). The effect of goodness onencoding time in visual pattern discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics. 16(3). 426–430. 51 indexed citations
8.
Pomerantz, James R. & W. R. Garner. (1973). The role of configuration and target discriminability in a visual search task. Memory & Cognition. 1(1). 64–68. 6 indexed citations
9.
Garner, W. R., et al.. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology. 1(3). 225–241. 519 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Garner, W. R.. (1969). Speed of discrimination with redundant stimulus attributes. Perception & Psychophysics. 6(4). 221–224. 20 indexed citations
11.
Garner, W. R., et al.. (1968). The Perception and Learning of Temporal Patterns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 20(2). 97–109. 95 indexed citations
12.
Garner, W. R., et al.. (1966). Response uncertainty and perceptual difficulty of auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics. 1(1). 41–47. 77 indexed citations
13.
Garner, W. R. & C. Douglas Creelman. (1964). Effect of redundancy and duration on absolute judgments of visual stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67(2). 168–172. 18 indexed citations
14.
Garner, W. R. & David E. Clement. (1963). Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 2(5-6). 446–452. 202 indexed citations
15.
Garner, W. R., et al.. (1960). A Multivariate Solution of the Redundancy of Printed English. Psychological Reports. 6(1). 123–141. 8 indexed citations
16.
Garner, W. R.. (1959). The development of context effects in half-loudness judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58(3). 212–219. 6 indexed citations
17.
Garner, W. R.. (1958). Symmetric uncertainty analysis and its implications for psychology.. Psychological Review. 65(4). 183–196. 12 indexed citations
18.
Garner, W. R.. (1958). Advantages of the Discriminability Criterion for a Loudness Scale. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 30(11). 1005–1012. 91 indexed citations
19.
Lanier, Lyle H., David A. Grant, John L. Kennedy, et al.. (1952). Handbook of Experimental Psychology: A Special Review by Nine Psychologists.. Psychological Bulletin. 49(2). 156–182. 1 indexed citations
20.
Morgan, C. T., W. R. Garner, & Róbert Galambos. (1951). Pitch and Intensity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 23(6). 658–663. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026