Hans‐Peter Dienes

24 total papers · 909 total citations
18 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

Hans‐Peter Dienes is a scholar working on Immunology, Hepatology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Hans‐Peter Dienes has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Immunology, 5 papers in Hepatology and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Hans‐Peter Dienes's work include T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Hans‐Peter Dienes is often cited by papers focused on T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Hans‐Peter Dienes collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Netherlands. Hans‐Peter Dienes's co-authors include Karl‐Hermann Meyer zum Büschenfelde, Michael Manns, Peter Schirmacher, Margarete Odenthal, Christoph Scheicher, Konrad Reske, Ansgar W. Lohse, Karl-Hermann Meyer zum Büschenfelde, Christian Peschel and Stefan Rose‐John and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Hepatology and Kidney International.

In The Last Decade

Hans‐Peter Dienes

18 papers receiving 689 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Hans‐Peter Dienes 261 203 181 179 160 18 696
Nikola Baschuk 322 1.2× 255 1.3× 187 1.0× 107 0.6× 211 1.3× 21 735
Roberta Benvenuto 344 1.3× 157 0.8× 252 1.4× 183 1.0× 60 0.4× 24 774
Ying Zhang 170 0.7× 145 0.7× 214 1.2× 263 1.5× 109 0.7× 38 603
S Sugai 237 0.9× 123 0.6× 117 0.6× 102 0.6× 142 0.9× 31 592
Roberto Aiolfi 250 1.0× 79 0.4× 279 1.5× 262 1.5× 153 1.0× 16 689
Yoshinobu Koyama 258 1.0× 151 0.7× 164 0.9× 79 0.4× 135 0.8× 25 586
Debora Salerno 185 0.7× 185 0.9× 280 1.5× 171 1.0× 153 1.0× 16 654
Cheng-po Hu 108 0.4× 244 1.2× 279 1.5× 199 1.1× 174 1.1× 18 620
Cheng‐Po Hu 135 0.5× 284 1.4× 217 1.2× 149 0.8× 183 1.1× 27 698
Jingmin Zhao 127 0.5× 250 1.2× 282 1.6× 277 1.5× 183 1.1× 30 757

Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Peter Dienes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Peter Dienes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Peter Dienes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Peter Dienes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Peter Dienes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Peter Dienes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Peter Dienes. The network helps show where Hans‐Peter Dienes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans‐Peter Dienes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans‐Peter Dienes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans‐Peter Dienes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans‐Peter Dienes. Hans‐Peter Dienes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026